Bacteriological Profile of Peritoneal Fluid in Patients with Appendiceal Peritonitis at Tra Vinh General Hospital

Background: Appendiceal perforation–related peritonitis is a severe complication associated with a high risk of sepsis and mortality. Identification of causative pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns plays a crucial role in guiding effective treatment. Previous studies have reported that common pathogens include Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas spp., with an increasing trend of antimicrobial resistance. However, local data in Tra Vinh Province remain limited. Aims: This study was conducted to provide regional bacteriological evidence to support the rational selection of empirical antibiotics. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted on 158 patients diagnosed with appendiceal peritonitis who underwent surgical treatment at Tra Vinh General Hospital from January 2024 to July 2024. Methodology: Peritoneal fluid specimens were collected intraoperatively and subjected to bacterial culture and identification. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods. Results: A total of 158 cases were included, with a mean age of 49.23 ± 16.23 years (range: 15–90 years). The study population consisted of 49.4% males (n=78) and 50.6% females (n=80), with a male-to-female ratio of 0.9:1. The overall culture positivity rate was 77.8%. The most frequently isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli, accounting for 61.4% (97 cases), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae at 4.4% (7 cases) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 2.5% (4 cases). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains were predominantly Escherichia coli (52.6%, 51/97 cases) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.8%, 1/7 cases), exhibiting high resistance rates to most tested antibiotics. In contrast, non-ESBL-producing strains remained susceptible or intermediately susceptible to several antibiotics. Most Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to multiple antibiotics, with resistance observed only to ciprofloxacin in 50% of cases. Conclusion: Escherichia coli was identified as the predominant pathogen in appendiceal peritonitis, with a high proportion of ESBL-producing and multidrug-resistant strains. Non-ESBL-producing organisms and Pseudomonas aeruginosa generally retained susceptibility to several antimicrobial agents. These findings underscore the importance of bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in optimizing antibiotic therapy for appendiceal peritonitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2026/v24i41377
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacteriological Profile of Peritoneal Fluid in Patients with Appendiceal Peritonitis at Tra Vinh General Hospital

Ho Y Bang, Huynh Van Linh
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Bacteriological Profile of Peritoneal Fluid in Patients with Appendiceal Peritonitis at Tra Vinh General Hospital

Ho Y Bang, Huynh Van Linh
article en

Abstract

Background: Appendiceal perforation–related peritonitis is a severe complication associated with a high risk of sepsis and mortality. Identification of causative pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns plays a crucial role in guiding effective treatment. Previous studies have reported that common pathogens include Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas spp., with an increasing trend of antimicrobial resistance. However, local data in Tra Vinh Province remain limited. Aims: This study was conducted to provide regional bacteriological evidence to support the rational selection of empirical antibiotics. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted on 158 patients diagnosed with appendiceal peritonitis who underwent surgical treatment at Tra Vinh General Hospital from January 2024 to July 2024. Methodology: Peritoneal fluid specimens were collected intraoperatively and subjected to bacterial culture and identification. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods. Results: A total of 158 cases were included, with a mean age of 49.23 ± 16.23 years (range: 15–90 years). The study population consisted of 49.4% males (n=78) and 50.6% females (n=80), with a male-to-female ratio of 0.9:1. The overall culture positivity rate was 77.8%. The most frequently isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli, accounting for 61.4% (97 cases), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae at 4.4% (7 cases) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 2.5% (4 cases). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains were predominantly Escherichia coli (52.6%, 51/97 cases) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.8%, 1/7 cases), exhibiting high resistance rates to most tested antibiotics. In contrast, non-ESBL-producing strains remained susceptible or intermediately susceptible to several antibiotics. Most Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to multiple antibiotics, with resistance observed only to ciprofloxacin in 50% of cases. Conclusion: Escherichia coli was identified as the predominant pathogen in appendiceal peritonitis, with a high proportion of ESBL-producing and multidrug-resistant strains. Non-ESBL-producing organisms and Pseudomonas aeruginosa generally retained susceptibility to several antimicrobial agents. These findings underscore the importance of bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in optimizing antibiotic therapy for appendiceal peritonitis.

Asian Journal of Medicine and HealthVol. 24(4)
Tra Vinh University (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.