Correction for Lazzaroni et al., Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes

The authors note that Fig. 4 appeared incorrectly: "The error is in Fig. 4, graph B. The plotted values do not correspond to the underlying data used in the manuscript.We have rerun the R code used to generate the figure, and the figure now reproduces correctly.This suggests that the originally exported figure may have been produced from an unintended object/state in the R session (e.g., cached/memorized data or an outdated object), resulting in incorrect values being displayed in the plot.Unfortunately, we cannot fully reconstruct why those incorrect values appeared at the time of figure creation, but we have verified that the corrected figure is fully consistent with the data and the results reported in the paper.The corrected figure is identical to the version included in our initially submitted manuscript (the version that underwent peer review).During the revision process, we reran the code to incorporate a reviewer's suggestion (adding a legend), and it was during that step that the incorrect figure appears to have been generated and subsequently included in the final files.

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2609972123
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction for Lazzaroni et al., Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Correction for Lazzaroni et al., Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes

article en

Abstract

The authors note that Fig. 4 appeared incorrectly: "The error is in Fig. 4, graph B. The plotted values do not correspond to the underlying data used in the manuscript.We have rerun the R code used to generate the figure, and the figure now reproduces correctly.This suggests that the originally exported figure may have been produced from an unintended object/state in the R session (e.g., cached/memorized data or an outdated object), resulting in incorrect values being displayed in the plot.Unfortunately, we cannot fully reconstruct why those incorrect values appeared at the time of figure creation, but we have verified that the corrected figure is fully consistent with the data and the results reported in the paper.The corrected figure is identical to the version included in our initially submitted manuscript (the version that underwent peer review).During the revision process, we reran the code to incorporate a reviewer's suggestion (adding a legend), and it was during that step that the incorrect figure appears to have been generated and subsequently included in the final files.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(15)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.