“Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space”: A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research

BACKGROUND: Diversity on biomedical research teams may lead to higher quality research, but some groups remain under-represented (UR) on research teams. Evaluating the challenges that UR scholars in the health sciences face could inform policies that institutions could take to recruit and retain UR scholars. OBJECTIVE: We used a large qualitative dataset to examine challenges in pursuing and persisting in research careers among UR postdoctoral and early-career faculty scholars participating in a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN: We conducted 78 individual qualitative interviews. Most participants held MDs or PhDs and were Black, Hispanic, or biracial. Interviews used a semi-structured guide and were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team of investigators developed an initial codebook based on a subset of interviews, which was iteratively revised by the team. After a final codebook was agreed upon, codes were assigned to all data. Codes were grouped into themes and sub-themes, which were discussed by the team. We present key themes and illustrative quotes. KEY RESULTS: Career challenges reported by UR scholars came from the culture of academia as well as from external factors. Academia culture challenges included demand for productivity and funding, bias and racism, competition and hierarchy, and the "secret rules" to the system. External challenges included financial stress, being an immigrant, and family demands. Responses to challenges could be positive, including making a career pivot, building resilience, finding one's community, or finding one's passion. Negative consequences to challenges included burnout, imposter syndrome, and low belongingness. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges faced by UR scholars can be both internal and external to the academy and can induce negative consequences among UR scholars, but some scholars also build resilience and find passion in the face of these challenges. Efforts to improve the culture of academia and to foster positive mentoring could help retain UR scholars in biomedical science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10366-x
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space”: A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research

Holly N. Thomas, Megan Hamm, Marie Norman, Natalia E. Morone et al.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

“Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space”: A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research

Holly N. Thomas, Megan Hamm, Marie Norman, Natalia E. Morone, Audrey J. Murrell, Doris M. Rubio, Hemika Vempalli, Nancy Gauvin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diversity on biomedical research teams may lead to higher quality research, but some groups remain under-represented (UR) on research teams. Evaluating the challenges that UR scholars in the health sciences face could inform policies that institutions could take to recruit and retain UR scholars. OBJECTIVE: We used a large qualitative dataset to examine challenges in pursuing and persisting in research careers among UR postdoctoral and early-career faculty scholars participating in a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN: We conducted 78 individual qualitative interviews. Most participants held MDs or PhDs and were Black, Hispanic, or biracial. Interviews used a semi-structured guide and were audio-recorded and transcribed. A team of investigators developed an initial codebook based on a subset of interviews, which was iteratively revised by the team. After a final codebook was agreed upon, codes were assigned to all data. Codes were grouped into themes and sub-themes, which were discussed by the team. We present key themes and illustrative quotes. KEY RESULTS: Career challenges reported by UR scholars came from the culture of academia as well as from external factors. Academia culture challenges included demand for productivity and funding, bias and racism, competition and hierarchy, and the "secret rules" to the system. External challenges included financial stress, being an immigrant, and family demands. Responses to challenges could be positive, including making a career pivot, building resilience, finding one's community, or finding one's passion. Negative consequences to challenges included burnout, imposter syndrome, and low belongingness. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges faced by UR scholars can be both internal and external to the academy and can induce negative consequences among UR scholars, but some scholars also build resilience and find passion in the face of these challenges. Efforts to improve the culture of academia and to foster positive mentoring could help retain UR scholars in biomedical science.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Boston University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), UPMC Health System (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
University of Pittsburgh, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.