Bridging the Digital Divide Among Higher Education Faculty: The Role of University Type and Faculty ICT Expertise

This study examines how university type (public vs. private) and disciplinary background influence the adoption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and self-perceived digital competence among university professors in Latin America. Identifying institutional and disciplinary disparities is essential in the context of accelerated digital transformation in higher education. The sample comprised 1114 professors from public and private universities, and data was collected using a validated instrument measuring ICT valuation, frequency of use, and perceived digital competence. Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess differences by institutional type and disciplinary field. The results show significant differences in ICT valuation, usage frequency, and perceived digital competence across university types and disciplines. Professors from private universities reported higher digital preparedness, while disciplinary areas displayed distinct ICT adoption patterns. Although ICT use increased across all groups during the pandemic, the digital gap between public and private institutions narrowed but was not fully eliminated. These findings support the development of targeted professional training, strategic resource allocation, and institutional policies, particularly in public universities, to enhance digital competence and promote sustainable ICT integration, contributing to educational equity and progress toward Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040579
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Digital Divide Among Higher Education Faculty: The Role of University Type and Faculty ICT Expertise

Antonio del Bosque, Álvaro Antón-Sancho, Diego Vergara, Pablo Fernández-Arias et al.
Education Sciences
Digital literacy in education
article

Bridging the Digital Divide Among Higher Education Faculty: The Role of University Type and Faculty ICT Expertise

Antonio del Bosque, Álvaro Antón-Sancho, Diego Vergara, Pablo Fernández-Arias, Georgios Lampropoulos
article en

Abstract

This study examines how university type (public vs. private) and disciplinary background influence the adoption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and self-perceived digital competence among university professors in Latin America. Identifying institutional and disciplinary disparities is essential in the context of accelerated digital transformation in higher education. The sample comprised 1114 professors from public and private universities, and data was collected using a validated instrument measuring ICT valuation, frequency of use, and perceived digital competence. Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess differences by institutional type and disciplinary field. The results show significant differences in ICT valuation, usage frequency, and perceived digital competence across university types and disciplines. Professors from private universities reported higher digital preparedness, while disciplinary areas displayed distinct ICT adoption patterns. Although ICT use increased across all groups during the pandemic, the digital gap between public and private institutions narrowed but was not fully eliminated. These findings support the development of targeted professional training, strategic resource allocation, and institutional policies, particularly in public universities, to enhance digital competence and promote sustainable ICT integration, contributing to educational equity and progress toward Sustainable Development Goals.

Education SciencesVol. 16(4)
University of Nicosia (CY), Catholic University of Ávila (ES), University of Macedonia (GR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.