Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews

ABSTRACT Open access to health evidence is essential for informed decision‐making, yet many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) remain behind paywalls. This study assessed the accessibility of RCTs cited in Cochrane intervention systematic reviews, focusing on open access availability and alternative access options. We analysed 491 RCTs from a random sample of 50 Cochrane reviews published in early 2023. Overall, 43.0% required payment for access, but this proportion declined over time, from 60.0% for articles published between 1980 and 1999 to 20.7% for those from 2020 to 2023. Among paywalled articles, the lowest fee provided 24‐h access in 37.0% of cases. However, 49.8% of these studies were available in full text via Google Scholar, and 95.3% of the remaining could be accessed through Sci‐Hub. Despite the persistent presence of paywalls, access barriers have decreased over time, and alternative platforms provide widespread availability of restricted articles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learned Publishing
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2058
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews

Ana Brañez‐Condorena, Alvaro Taype‐Rondan, Alexander M. Parra‐Huaroto, Leonardo J. Uribe‐Cavero et al.
Learned Publishing
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews

Ana Brañez‐Condorena, Alvaro Taype‐Rondan, Alexander M. Parra‐Huaroto, Leonardo J. Uribe‐Cavero, Patricia J. Vera‐Maccha
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Open access to health evidence is essential for informed decision‐making, yet many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) remain behind paywalls. This study assessed the accessibility of RCTs cited in Cochrane intervention systematic reviews, focusing on open access availability and alternative access options. We analysed 491 RCTs from a random sample of 50 Cochrane reviews published in early 2023. Overall, 43.0% required payment for access, but this proportion declined over time, from 60.0% for articles published between 1980 and 1999 to 20.7% for those from 2020 to 2023. Among paywalled articles, the lowest fee provided 24‐h access in 37.0% of cases. However, 49.8% of these studies were available in full text via Google Scholar, and 95.3% of the remaining could be accessed through Sci‐Hub. Despite the persistent presence of paywalls, access barriers have decreased over time, and alternative platforms provide widespread availability of restricted articles.

Learned PublishingVol. 39(2)
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (PE), Saint Aloysius Gonzaga National University (PE), EsSALUD (PE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.