What Families Make Their Children Carry: Intergenerational Structural Debt

This paper extends Structural Intelligence (SI) into the temporal and familial domain of inheritance. Its central claim is that some of what later generations suffer is not best understood as their own burden alone, nor as atmosphere, story, or vague family pain, but as transferred structural debt. When one generation cannot metabolize what it has been given to carry, and preserves coherence through silence, distortion, cost-export, or defended non-repair, that burden does not simply disappear. It moves into the next field. Children may therefore enter life not only with their own developmental possibilities, but with inherited gradient load, inherited roles, inherited defended coherence, and inherited pressure to pay for a stability they did not create. The paper argues that inheritance is structural before it is interpretive, that a symptom may function as a payment mechanism that keeps older coherence intact, and that healing requires more than insight into family history. It requires the interruption of inherited debt-service, the differentiation of present burden from ancestral burden, and the building of enough floor, capacity, and answerability that a descendant no longer has to pay for a coherence they did not choose.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19441241
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Families Make Their Children Carry: Intergenerational Structural Debt

Vladisav Jovanovic
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

What Families Make Their Children Carry: Intergenerational Structural Debt

Vladisav Jovanovic
article en

Abstract

This paper extends Structural Intelligence (SI) into the temporal and familial domain of inheritance. Its central claim is that some of what later generations suffer is not best understood as their own burden alone, nor as atmosphere, story, or vague family pain, but as transferred structural debt. When one generation cannot metabolize what it has been given to carry, and preserves coherence through silence, distortion, cost-export, or defended non-repair, that burden does not simply disappear. It moves into the next field. Children may therefore enter life not only with their own developmental possibilities, but with inherited gradient load, inherited roles, inherited defended coherence, and inherited pressure to pay for a stability they did not create. The paper argues that inheritance is structural before it is interpretive, that a symptom may function as a payment mechanism that keeps older coherence intact, and that healing requires more than insight into family history. It requires the interruption of inherited debt-service, the differentiation of present burden from ancestral burden, and the building of enough floor, capacity, and answerability that a descendant no longer has to pay for a coherence they did not choose.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Families Make Their Children Carry: Intergenerational Structural Debt — Vladisav Jovanovic · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS