Modelling energy losses arising from overridden backtracking in utility-scale photovoltaic plants on slightly undulating terrain: Implementation in the SISIFO tool for performance pre-assessment

Underperformance of utility-scale photovoltaic plants continues to be systematically reported. Based on a detailed analysis over one year of 10–15-minute measurements from over seven thousand single-axis trackers across seven utility-scale photovoltaic plants, this study identifies a previously unaddressed source of such underperformance: tracking irradiation gain during backtracking is lower than expected. Slight terrain unevenness forces tracker controllers to override optimal backtracking angles to avoid inter-row shading, reducing tracker tilt and direct irradiance collection compared to flat-terrain simulations. This leads to a new loss category, here denominated suboptimal backtracking losses, which remain hidden within standard performance indicators and create an unquantified gap between simulated and actual energy yield. To address this, three overridden backtracking models are developed to reproduce real tracker behaviour through (1) direct overriding of the tracking angle, (2) analytical overriding of inter-row spacing, and (3) a virtual ground slope representing unevenness. Implemented in SISIFO, an open-source photovoltaic simulation tool, the models’ estimates better match real performance, allowing estimation of suboptimal backtracking losses and explaining up to 2% of irradiance capture losses relative to conventional flat-terrain approaches. At utility scale, this difference is large enough to affect annual energy yield predictions and plant profitability, quantifying backtracking-related underperformance. • A cause of underperformance in utility-scale one-axis tracking PV plants is revealed. • SCADA data from trackers show intentional overriding of optimal backtracking angles. • Tracking radiation gain is lower than expected due to slightly uneven terrain. • In-plane irradiation and final energy yield losses reach 2%. • Identifies unreported suboptimal backtracking losses and three methods to model them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable Energy
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125734
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling energy losses arising from overridden backtracking in utility-scale photovoltaic plants on slightly undulating terrain: Implementation in the SISIFO tool for performance pre-assessment

Javier Martín-Rueda, Juan Santamaría-Sancho, Javier R. Ledesma, E. Lorenzo
Renewable Energy
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Modelling energy losses arising from overridden backtracking in utility-scale photovoltaic plants on slightly undulating terrain: Implementation in the SISIFO tool for performance pre-assessment

Javier Martín-Rueda, Juan Santamaría-Sancho, Javier R. Ledesma, E. Lorenzo
article en

Abstract

Underperformance of utility-scale photovoltaic plants continues to be systematically reported. Based on a detailed analysis over one year of 10–15-minute measurements from over seven thousand single-axis trackers across seven utility-scale photovoltaic plants, this study identifies a previously unaddressed source of such underperformance: tracking irradiation gain during backtracking is lower than expected. Slight terrain unevenness forces tracker controllers to override optimal backtracking angles to avoid inter-row shading, reducing tracker tilt and direct irradiance collection compared to flat-terrain simulations. This leads to a new loss category, here denominated suboptimal backtracking losses, which remain hidden within standard performance indicators and create an unquantified gap between simulated and actual energy yield. To address this, three overridden backtracking models are developed to reproduce real tracker behaviour through (1) direct overriding of the tracking angle, (2) analytical overriding of inter-row spacing, and (3) a virtual ground slope representing unevenness. Implemented in SISIFO, an open-source photovoltaic simulation tool, the models’ estimates better match real performance, allowing estimation of suboptimal backtracking losses and explaining up to 2% of irradiance capture losses relative to conventional flat-terrain approaches. At utility scale, this difference is large enough to affect annual energy yield predictions and plant profitability, quantifying backtracking-related underperformance. • A cause of underperformance in utility-scale one-axis tracking PV plants is revealed. • SCADA data from trackers show intentional overriding of optimal backtracking angles. • Tracking radiation gain is lower than expected due to slightly uneven terrain. • In-plane irradiation and final energy yield losses reach 2%. • Identifies unreported suboptimal backtracking losses and three methods to model them.

Renewable EnergyVol. 267
IMDEA Energy Institute (ES)
European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency, European Commission, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.