Process-level benchmarking of hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing routes for aerospace structural components

A comprehensive benchmarking study of a critical aerospace component, the pickle fork derivative, has been performed by fabricating it using various additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing process routes. The objective was to evaluate and compare the process capability, geometric fidelity, and hybrid manufacturability of emerging deposition and forging technologies for structural applications. The selected processes included wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), wire-laser directed energy deposition (DED), laser powder bed fusion ( L -PBF), powder-blown DED, additive friction stir deposition (AFSD), and agility Forging. Wrought 316 L stainless steel and Al 6061 parts were machined and served as baselines. Each preform was fabricated, scanned using structured light, and subsequently finish-machined following a standardized hybrid processing route to ensure consistent benchmarking. The results reveal distinct process-dependent characteristics in build resolution, surface integrity, and overbuild allowance, which directly influence subsequent machining requirements and achievable dimensional accuracy. Fusion-based processes such as L -PBF and laser wire-DED produced near-net geometries with minimal overbuild, whereas WAAM, AFSD, and agility forging exhibited higher material allowances due to coarser resolution, thermal distortion, and build volume limitations. Despite these variations, all preforms were successfully machined to achieve dimensional conformity with the target CAD geometry, demonstrating the compatibility of additive and hybrid approaches for structural part fabrication. Further, preliminary mechanical performance evaluations were performed for hardness, strength, and fatigue resistance. The study highlights the critical role of process selection and preform accuracy in optimizing hybrid manufacturing workflows, providing key insights for the integration of additive, subtractive, and forging processes in aerospace component production. • Presents process-level benchmarking of hybrid additive-subtractive routes for an aerospace pickle fork component. • Establishes a unified workflow integrating additive fabrication, scanning, and machining for consistent comparison. • Quantifies differences in geometric fidelity, overbuild, and manufacturability across multiple process classes. • Shows processes like L-PBF and wire-laser DED minimize machining through near-net-shape fabrication. • Reveals process-dependent behavior in 316L, with wire-laser DED showing superior fatigue strength despite higher porosity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2026.04.007
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process-level benchmarking of hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing routes for aerospace structural components

Caleb Campbell, Glenn S. Daehn, Jake Dvorak, Bradley Howell Jared et al.
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Process-level benchmarking of hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing routes for aerospace structural components

Caleb Campbell, Glenn S. Daehn, Jake Dvorak, Bradley Howell Jared, Nathaniel J. Hall, Tony L. Schmitz, Alexander R. Bandar, Rob Patterson, Devon Goodspeed, Rowan Rolark, Kamren Sargent, Brian Thurston, Rich Tomazin, John Lewandowski, Sweta Baruah, Xingyang Li, Tao Sun
article en

Abstract

A comprehensive benchmarking study of a critical aerospace component, the pickle fork derivative, has been performed by fabricating it using various additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing process routes. The objective was to evaluate and compare the process capability, geometric fidelity, and hybrid manufacturability of emerging deposition and forging technologies for structural applications. The selected processes included wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), wire-laser directed energy deposition (DED), laser powder bed fusion ( L -PBF), powder-blown DED, additive friction stir deposition (AFSD), and agility Forging. Wrought 316 L stainless steel and Al 6061 parts were machined and served as baselines. Each preform was fabricated, scanned using structured light, and subsequently finish-machined following a standardized hybrid processing route to ensure consistent benchmarking. The results reveal distinct process-dependent characteristics in build resolution, surface integrity, and overbuild allowance, which directly influence subsequent machining requirements and achievable dimensional accuracy. Fusion-based processes such as L -PBF and laser wire-DED produced near-net geometries with minimal overbuild, whereas WAAM, AFSD, and agility forging exhibited higher material allowances due to coarser resolution, thermal distortion, and build volume limitations. Despite these variations, all preforms were successfully machined to achieve dimensional conformity with the target CAD geometry, demonstrating the compatibility of additive and hybrid approaches for structural part fabrication. Further, preliminary mechanical performance evaluations were performed for hardness, strength, and fatigue resistance. The study highlights the critical role of process selection and preform accuracy in optimizing hybrid manufacturing workflows, providing key insights for the integration of additive, subtractive, and forging processes in aerospace component production. • Presents process-level benchmarking of hybrid additive-subtractive routes for an aerospace pickle fork component. • Establishes a unified workflow integrating additive fabrication, scanning, and machining for consistent comparison. • Quantifies differences in geometric fidelity, overbuild, and manufacturability across multiple process classes. • Shows processes like L-PBF and wire-laser DED minimize machining through near-net-shape fabrication. • Reveals process-dependent behavior in 316L, with wire-laser DED showing superior fatigue strength despite higher porosity.

Journal of Manufacturing SystemsVol. 86
Northwestern University (US), Davidson College (US), Knoxville College (US), The Ohio State University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Engineering Research Centers
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.