Normative feedback of hybrid ALMPs: Citizen-level norms of social solidarity in France and Belgium

Abstract Social investment policies have introduced a shift in the normative underpinnings of European welfare states but are layered into compensatory and workfarist policies. This article questions the normative outcomes of social investment from a citizen perspective, asking how hybrid active labour market policies (ALMPs) shape citizen-level norms of social solidarity. Building on normative feedback theory, we conduct a comparative qualitative secondary analysis of focus-group datasets from France and Belgium (2006; 2019), where enabling instruments were gradually introduced between observation points. Based on a two-fold operationalization of citizen-level norms, we report that compensatory and workfarist cues dominate discussions with scarce reference to capacitation. The frames participants rely on feature normative tensions, particularly the ambivalent coexistence of compensation and individual responsibility. The normative feedback of ALMPs takes the form of a dilemma between generous-yet-stringent solidarity. Social investment policy norms have not (yet) reshaped citizen-level norms of social solidarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2026.10092
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative feedback of hybrid ALMPs: Citizen-level norms of social solidarity in France and Belgium

Virginie Van Ingelgom, Claire Dupuy, Damien Pennetreau
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Normative feedback of hybrid ALMPs: Citizen-level norms of social solidarity in France and Belgium

Virginie Van Ingelgom, Claire Dupuy, Damien Pennetreau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social investment policies have introduced a shift in the normative underpinnings of European welfare states but are layered into compensatory and workfarist policies. This article questions the normative outcomes of social investment from a citizen perspective, asking how hybrid active labour market policies (ALMPs) shape citizen-level norms of social solidarity. Building on normative feedback theory, we conduct a comparative qualitative secondary analysis of focus-group datasets from France and Belgium (2006; 2019), where enabling instruments were gradually introduced between observation points. Based on a two-fold operationalization of citizen-level norms, we report that compensatory and workfarist cues dominate discussions with scarce reference to capacitation. The frames participants rely on feature normative tensions, particularly the ambivalent coexistence of compensation and individual responsibility. The normative feedback of ALMPs takes the form of a dilemma between generous-yet-stringent solidarity. Social investment policy norms have not (yet) reshaped citizen-level norms of social solidarity.

Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy
Fund for Scientific Research (BE), Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FR), UCLouvain (BE)
European Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Normative feedback of hybrid ALMPs: Citizen-level norms of social solidarity in France and Belgium — Virginie Van Ingelgom, Claire Dupuy, et al. · Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS