Pollination and dispersal networks in the Amazonian tree flora

We collected flower-visiting data for 5,201 Amazonian trees species, corresponding to 50% of all known tree species and 94% of all estimated individuals in Amazonia. Bees are the most common flower-visitors responsible for 74% of all studied tree genera and 74.1% of all individual trees, followed by generalist flower-visitors (39.2%). Sixteen tree genera make up 50% of all interactions between tree genera and their flower-visitors. Two of those: Inga, Miconia, each provide more than 2% of all interactions at genus level while six: Protium, Eschweilera, Inga, Pouteria, Ocotea, and Virola each provide more than 2% of all interactions at the estimated tree population level, underscoring the importance of these tree genera in the forest. Forty hyperdominant genera are responsible for half of the fruit resources of the Amazonian disperser community. Nearly 80% of these Amazonian tree species rely on animals for both pollination and seed dispersal, and less than 1% are free from animal involvement in these key life stages. This strong biotic dependence highlights a critical point: animal-mediated interactions are not peripheral but central to the maintenance, regeneration, and spatial structure of Amazonian forests, which makes halting of defaunation in these forests a priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09896-1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pollination and dispersal networks in the Amazonian tree flora

Matt Sean McGlone, Caio S. Ballarin, Tereza Cristina Giannini, Lorena Bueno Valadão-Mendes et al.
Communications Biology
Plant and animal studies
article

Pollination and dispersal networks in the Amazonian tree flora

Matt Sean McGlone, Caio S. Ballarin, Tereza Cristina Giannini, Lorena Bueno Valadão-Mendes, Diego F. Correa, Hans ter Steege, Vitor H. F. Gomes, Renato A. F. de Lima, Pablo Stevenson, Carlos Eduardo Pinto
article en

Abstract

We collected flower-visiting data for 5,201 Amazonian trees species, corresponding to 50% of all known tree species and 94% of all estimated individuals in Amazonia. Bees are the most common flower-visitors responsible for 74% of all studied tree genera and 74.1% of all individual trees, followed by generalist flower-visitors (39.2%). Sixteen tree genera make up 50% of all interactions between tree genera and their flower-visitors. Two of those: Inga, Miconia, each provide more than 2% of all interactions at genus level while six: Protium, Eschweilera, Inga, Pouteria, Ocotea, and Virola each provide more than 2% of all interactions at the estimated tree population level, underscoring the importance of these tree genera in the forest. Forty hyperdominant genera are responsible for half of the fruit resources of the Amazonian disperser community. Nearly 80% of these Amazonian tree species rely on animals for both pollination and seed dispersal, and less than 1% are free from animal involvement in these key life stages. This strong biotic dependence highlights a critical point: animal-mediated interactions are not peripheral but central to the maintenance, regeneration, and spatial structure of Amazonian forests, which makes halting of defaunation in these forests a priority.

Communications BiologyVol. 9(1)
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), University of Turku (FI), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), The University of Queensland (AU), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Vale Technological Institute (BR), Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.