A persistent diagnostic gap: awareness and workup of bleeding disorders in heavy menstrual bleeding among Dutch gynecologists and hematologists

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common in the general population, affecting at least one-quarter of women of reproductive age. A bleeding disorder has been reported as an underlying cause of HMB in 30% of hospital-based outpatient population suffering from HMB. Despite this, bleeding disorders appear to be substantially underdiagnosed in HMB. Our primary objective is to evaluate the awareness and diagnostic work up regarding bleeding disorders in patients with HMB among gynecologists and hematologists in the Netherlands. An online questionnaire was conducted in 2023. The survey was distributed by email, with an anonymous link to 1508 gynecologists and 646 hematologists. Of the 2154 emails sent, 211 surveys were analyzed: 149 from gynecologists and 62 from hematologists representing a 10% response rate. Most gynecologists (89%) estimated the prevalence of bleeding disorders in HMB to be below 15%, with 40% under 5%. In comparison, the majority of hematologists (77%) placed their estimate between 5% and 30%. Screening tools, including pre-visit questionnaires, medical history or laboratory evaluation, were not structurally used by gynecologists. Only 5% of gynecologists reported participating in multidisciplinary team meetings on bleeding disorders and HMB, compared to 34% of hematologists. Moreover, 94% of responding gynecologists reported seldom or never referring HMB patients to a hematologist. This study highlights the underestimation of the prevalence of bleeding disorders among patients with HMB. Systematic screening for bleeding disorders in patients with HMB by gynecologists is largely lacking. These findings underscore the necessity of increasing awareness of bleeding disorders and to implement a structured diagnostic workup of HMB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04444-9
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A persistent diagnostic gap: awareness and workup of bleeding disorders in heavy menstrual bleeding among Dutch gynecologists and hematologists

Laurens Nieuwenhuizen, Stijn Groenen, J. C. Leemans, P. M. A. J. Geomini et al.
BMC Women s Health
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

A persistent diagnostic gap: awareness and workup of bleeding disorders in heavy menstrual bleeding among Dutch gynecologists and hematologists

Laurens Nieuwenhuizen, Stijn Groenen, J. C. Leemans, P. M. A. J. Geomini, S. Luijten, M. Y. Bongers
article en

Abstract

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common in the general population, affecting at least one-quarter of women of reproductive age. A bleeding disorder has been reported as an underlying cause of HMB in 30% of hospital-based outpatient population suffering from HMB. Despite this, bleeding disorders appear to be substantially underdiagnosed in HMB. Our primary objective is to evaluate the awareness and diagnostic work up regarding bleeding disorders in patients with HMB among gynecologists and hematologists in the Netherlands. An online questionnaire was conducted in 2023. The survey was distributed by email, with an anonymous link to 1508 gynecologists and 646 hematologists. Of the 2154 emails sent, 211 surveys were analyzed: 149 from gynecologists and 62 from hematologists representing a 10% response rate. Most gynecologists (89%) estimated the prevalence of bleeding disorders in HMB to be below 15%, with 40% under 5%. In comparison, the majority of hematologists (77%) placed their estimate between 5% and 30%. Screening tools, including pre-visit questionnaires, medical history or laboratory evaluation, were not structurally used by gynecologists. Only 5% of gynecologists reported participating in multidisciplinary team meetings on bleeding disorders and HMB, compared to 34% of hematologists. Moreover, 94% of responding gynecologists reported seldom or never referring HMB patients to a hematologist. This study highlights the underestimation of the prevalence of bleeding disorders among patients with HMB. Systematic screening for bleeding disorders in patients with HMB by gynecologists is largely lacking. These findings underscore the necessity of increasing awareness of bleeding disorders and to implement a structured diagnostic workup of HMB.

BMC Women s Health
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), Maastro Clinic (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.