“Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Facial Feminization Surgery”

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an important aspect of gender affirming care and improves quality of life. However, FFS is sparsely covered by insurance and is the most commonly denied gender affirming procedure. We conducted, to our knowledge, the first cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of undergoing FFS. METHODS: We designed a Markov cohort model of 30-year-old transgender women to evaluate the cost effectiveness of FFS compared to no FFS, with 5- and 10-year time-horizons from a U.S. health system perspective, across all accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs) in the U.S. ($50,000-$150,000/quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The primary outcomes were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in U.S. Dollars (USD) per QALY and the per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of covering FFS. Transition probabilities and utilities were population-specific and were sourced from published data. Our budget impact model considers projected trends in demand for FFS. RESULTS: Compared to not receiving the surgery, FFS accrued $23,200 more dollars and 0.5 more QALYs across five years, with an ICER of $44,300 [95% CI: $32,200- $63,800]. FFS remained cost effective across all scenarios and sensitivity analyses, notably even with a diminishing mental health benefit of FFS across 10 years. FFS was favored in 100% of 10,000 probabilistic iterations at a WTP of $100,000/QALY. The budget impact of FFS was $0.049 in 2025 and is projected to decrease over the next five years despite a projected increase in demand for FFS. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance coverage of FFS is cost-effective at a WTP of $100,000/QALY with a low budget impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013106
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Facial Feminization Surgery”

Samira Glaeser-Khan, Yizhuo Shen, George Goshua, Thao T. Wolbert et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

“Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Facial Feminization Surgery”

Samira Glaeser-Khan, Yizhuo Shen, George Goshua, Thao T. Wolbert, Thayer Mukherjee, Satoko Ito, Michael Alperovich
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an important aspect of gender affirming care and improves quality of life. However, FFS is sparsely covered by insurance and is the most commonly denied gender affirming procedure. We conducted, to our knowledge, the first cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of undergoing FFS. METHODS: We designed a Markov cohort model of 30-year-old transgender women to evaluate the cost effectiveness of FFS compared to no FFS, with 5- and 10-year time-horizons from a U.S. health system perspective, across all accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs) in the U.S. ($50,000-$150,000/quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The primary outcomes were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in U.S. Dollars (USD) per QALY and the per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of covering FFS. Transition probabilities and utilities were population-specific and were sourced from published data. Our budget impact model considers projected trends in demand for FFS. RESULTS: Compared to not receiving the surgery, FFS accrued $23,200 more dollars and 0.5 more QALYs across five years, with an ICER of $44,300 [95% CI: $32,200- $63,800]. FFS remained cost effective across all scenarios and sensitivity analyses, notably even with a diminishing mental health benefit of FFS across 10 years. FFS was favored in 100% of 10,000 probabilistic iterations at a WTP of $100,000/QALY. The budget impact of FFS was $0.049 in 2025 and is projected to decrease over the next five years despite a projected increase in demand for FFS. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance coverage of FFS is cost-effective at a WTP of $100,000/QALY with a low budget impact.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Yale University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.