One‐Class Autoencoders for Porcelain Art Attribution: The Case of William Billingsley

ABSTRACT This comprehensive study explores the application of advanced machine learning techniques, specifically one‐class autoencoders, for the authentication and attribution of English porcelain artworks. Focusing primarily on the works of William Billingsley (1758–1828), one of England's most celebrated porcelain decorators, we demonstrate how modern computational methods can complement traditional connoisseurship in resolving long‐standing attribution controversies. We present a novel autoencoder architecture trained on five carefully selected handcrafted features—entropy, energy, contrast, homogeneity and Hausdorff‐Besicovitch dimension—that effectively distinguishes genuine Billingsley works from those by other contemporary artists. The methodology is validated through multiple test cases, including authenticated Billingsley pieces from prestigious services (Earl Camden, Prince of Wales, Duke of Northumberland) and works known to be by other artists. Furthermore, we apply this framework to the historically contentious Pendock Barry dessert service (circa 1805–1808), a 90‐piece Derby porcelain service whose decoration has been disputed amongst scholars for over a century. Our experimental results demonstrate classification accuracies exceeding 75% for authentic Billingsley works, with reconstruction error metrics providing quantifiable measures of artistic similarity. This approach offers a complementary tool to traditional expert opinion, adding reliability, objectivity and reproducibility to the field of ceramic art authentication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeometry
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70140
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One‐Class Autoencoders for Porcelain Art Attribution: The Case of William Billingsley

Howell G. M. Edwards, Morgan C. T. Denyer, Rachel L. Denyer, Hassan Ugail
Archaeometry
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

One‐Class Autoencoders for Porcelain Art Attribution: The Case of William Billingsley

Howell G. M. Edwards, Morgan C. T. Denyer, Rachel L. Denyer, Hassan Ugail
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This comprehensive study explores the application of advanced machine learning techniques, specifically one‐class autoencoders, for the authentication and attribution of English porcelain artworks. Focusing primarily on the works of William Billingsley (1758–1828), one of England's most celebrated porcelain decorators, we demonstrate how modern computational methods can complement traditional connoisseurship in resolving long‐standing attribution controversies. We present a novel autoencoder architecture trained on five carefully selected handcrafted features—entropy, energy, contrast, homogeneity and Hausdorff‐Besicovitch dimension—that effectively distinguishes genuine Billingsley works from those by other contemporary artists. The methodology is validated through multiple test cases, including authenticated Billingsley pieces from prestigious services (Earl Camden, Prince of Wales, Duke of Northumberland) and works known to be by other artists. Furthermore, we apply this framework to the historically contentious Pendock Barry dessert service (circa 1805–1808), a 90‐piece Derby porcelain service whose decoration has been disputed amongst scholars for over a century. Our experimental results demonstrate classification accuracies exceeding 75% for authentic Billingsley works, with reconstruction error metrics providing quantifiable measures of artistic similarity. This approach offers a complementary tool to traditional expert opinion, adding reliability, objectivity and reproducibility to the field of ceramic art authentication.

Archaeometry
University of Bradford (GB), Oldham Council (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.