Attentional bias in paranoia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Paranoia is a transdiagnostic symptom and is associated with cognitive and social impairments. Attentional bias toward threat is thought to maintain paranoia. AIMS: Despite many studies, attentional biases in paranoia have not been systematically summarised, which was the aim of the current work. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, identifying 10 964 studies, of which 35 met inclusion criteria for review and 15 for meta-analysis. RESULTS: = 0.027), but more data is needed to confirm these effects. Limitations were primarily statistical and included likely underestimation of the overall effect size of the association between negative attentional bias and paranoia and a lack of sufficient studies to robustly examine moderators. CONCLUSIONS: Summarising this literature provides a rationale for existing and new interventions for paranoia that target biased attentional mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Open
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.10993
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attentional bias in paranoia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pamela Charlotte Jacobsen, Chloe Hampshire, George Vamvakas, Jenny Yiend et al.
BJPsych Open
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Attentional bias in paranoia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pamela Charlotte Jacobsen, Chloe Hampshire, George Vamvakas, Jenny Yiend, Laura Eid, Daniel Ståhl
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paranoia is a transdiagnostic symptom and is associated with cognitive and social impairments. Attentional bias toward threat is thought to maintain paranoia. AIMS: Despite many studies, attentional biases in paranoia have not been systematically summarised, which was the aim of the current work. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, identifying 10 964 studies, of which 35 met inclusion criteria for review and 15 for meta-analysis. RESULTS: = 0.027), but more data is needed to confirm these effects. Limitations were primarily statistical and included likely underestimation of the overall effect size of the association between negative attentional bias and paranoia and a lack of sufficient studies to robustly examine moderators. CONCLUSIONS: Summarising this literature provides a rationale for existing and new interventions for paranoia that target biased attentional mechanisms.

BJPsych OpenVol. 12(3)
King's College London (GB), University of Bath (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, King's College London, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.