Ergonomic effects of HMI design variables in dial-type gearshift manipulation

This study examined the ergonomic effects of HMI design variables determining the manipulation method of dial-type gearshifts. Eight design alternatives were derived by combining two implementation levels for each of three design variables: P-position engagement method (Rotation, Push), Gear indicator location (Up, Left), and Gear position sequence (RND, DNR). Forty-three participants performed gear-shifting tasks using working prototypes of the design alternatives, during which task completion time, number of extra manipulations, perceived workload, perceived safety, and preference were measured. The results revealed the superiority of 1) Push over Rotation; 2) Up over Left under RND, and Left over Up under DNR; 3) RND over DNR in general, and DNR over RND under Left; and 4) combinations of Push-Up-RND and Push-Left-DNR over other design alternatives. The findings and identified ergonomic design characteristics may inform future gearshift HMI designs that prevent driver confusion/misoperation, thereby enhancing driving performance and safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2653774
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ergonomic effects of HMI design variables in dial-type gearshift manipulation

Songha Lee, Donghyun Beck, Sehee An, J. Yoo
Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Ergonomic effects of HMI design variables in dial-type gearshift manipulation

Songha Lee, Donghyun Beck, Sehee An, J. Yoo
article en

Abstract

This study examined the ergonomic effects of HMI design variables determining the manipulation method of dial-type gearshifts. Eight design alternatives were derived by combining two implementation levels for each of three design variables: P-position engagement method (Rotation, Push), Gear indicator location (Up, Left), and Gear position sequence (RND, DNR). Forty-three participants performed gear-shifting tasks using working prototypes of the design alternatives, during which task completion time, number of extra manipulations, perceived workload, perceived safety, and preference were measured. The results revealed the superiority of 1) Push over Rotation; 2) Up over Left under RND, and Left over Up under DNR; 3) RND over DNR in general, and DNR over RND under Left; and 4) combinations of Push-Up-RND and Push-Left-DNR over other design alternatives. The findings and identified ergonomic design characteristics may inform future gearshift HMI designs that prevent driver confusion/misoperation, thereby enhancing driving performance and safety.

Ergonomics
Incheon National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.