Human-centered design of an exercise intervention for adolescent cancer patients: findings from a patient involvement workshop to inform intervention development

BACKGROUND: Only few exercise trials have been conducted in the immediate time after a child's first cancer diagnosis. The Exercise CC Trial was designed to study the effects of exercise during the first 8 weeks following the diagnosis. However, young patients have not been involved in designing an exercise intervention in this care-intensive period of time in which complying with regular exercise regimens may be particularly difficult. To understand factors facilitating compliance and to prevent drop-outs in this critical period, this study aims to engage adolescents with cancer in designing an exercise intervention by incorporating patient perspectives in research development. METHODS: A workshop was conducted with adolescents who had previously participated in exercise therapy during their cancer treatment. This interactive session allowed participants to share their experiences and contribute to the intervention design prior to enrolling patients in the trial. Data was collected through a group discussion, which was recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA20 software, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of participants' views. RESULTS: The workshop, attended by four patients aged 17 to 20, highlighted various aspects of exercise therapy. Participants valued the flexibility of choosing between various exercises and noted the psychological benefits of physical activity, which provided them with a constructive outlet and relief during treatment. They also appreciated the physical improvements and the motivational impact of monitoring progress. Importantly, the study revealed the need for personalized exercise regimes that consider individual physical conditions and preferences. CONCLUSIONS: We present an innovative approach in pediatric exercise oncology inviting the perspectives of adolescents and young adults to participate in research and shape the design of intervention details during the care-intensive phase immediately following a cancer diagnosis. We describe our "lessons learned" in giving adolescents a voice and share their knowledge and insights into their specific needs and preferences of exercise regimens in trials. This approach ensures that intervention details align with young patients' expectations, which can be opposite to experts' assumptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS-ID: DRKS00032259. Registered on 10.07.2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09686-4
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-centered design of an exercise intervention for adolescent cancer patients: findings from a patient involvement workshop to inform intervention development

Dania Schütze, Jennifer Engler, Mirjam Dieckelmann, S. Erhard et al.
Trials
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Human-centered design of an exercise intervention for adolescent cancer patients: findings from a patient involvement workshop to inform intervention development

Dania Schütze, Jennifer Engler, Mirjam Dieckelmann, S. Erhard, Micah Walker
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only few exercise trials have been conducted in the immediate time after a child's first cancer diagnosis. The Exercise CC Trial was designed to study the effects of exercise during the first 8 weeks following the diagnosis. However, young patients have not been involved in designing an exercise intervention in this care-intensive period of time in which complying with regular exercise regimens may be particularly difficult. To understand factors facilitating compliance and to prevent drop-outs in this critical period, this study aims to engage adolescents with cancer in designing an exercise intervention by incorporating patient perspectives in research development. METHODS: A workshop was conducted with adolescents who had previously participated in exercise therapy during their cancer treatment. This interactive session allowed participants to share their experiences and contribute to the intervention design prior to enrolling patients in the trial. Data was collected through a group discussion, which was recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA20 software, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of participants' views. RESULTS: The workshop, attended by four patients aged 17 to 20, highlighted various aspects of exercise therapy. Participants valued the flexibility of choosing between various exercises and noted the psychological benefits of physical activity, which provided them with a constructive outlet and relief during treatment. They also appreciated the physical improvements and the motivational impact of monitoring progress. Importantly, the study revealed the need for personalized exercise regimes that consider individual physical conditions and preferences. CONCLUSIONS: We present an innovative approach in pediatric exercise oncology inviting the perspectives of adolescents and young adults to participate in research and shape the design of intervention details during the care-intensive phase immediately following a cancer diagnosis. We describe our "lessons learned" in giving adolescents a voice and share their knowledge and insights into their specific needs and preferences of exercise regimens in trials. This approach ensures that intervention details align with young patients' expectations, which can be opposite to experts' assumptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS-ID: DRKS00032259. Registered on 10.07.2024.

TrialsVol. 27(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Gesundheitsamt (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Frankfurt Cancer Institute (DE)
Hilfe für krebskranke Kinder Frankfurt
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.