Youth Suicide and the Evidence Paradox

This Viewpoint discusses youth suicide rates in the US and how an evidence paradox—the populations at greatest risk are those in which randomized clinical trials are the most difficult to conduct—has affected prevention efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.0275
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Youth Suicide and the Evidence Paradox

Jessika M Mendes, Nilson N. Mendes Neto
JAMA Pediatrics
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Youth Suicide and the Evidence Paradox

Jessika M Mendes, Nilson N. Mendes Neto
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses youth suicide rates in the US and how an evidence paradox—the populations at greatest risk are those in which randomized clinical trials are the most difficult to conduct—has affected prevention efforts.

JAMA Pediatrics
Synopsys (Switzerland) (CH), Harvard University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Youth Suicide and the Evidence Paradox — Jessika M Mendes, Nilson N. Mendes Neto · JAMA Pediatrics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS