Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human ‘Predators’?

mortality assays on over 420 individuals from 61 species. Specifically, we tested (1) if the detectability of dorsal or ventral butterfly wings was related to toxicity, and (2) if butterflies that were more toxic had similar dorsal and ventral detectability. For dorsal surfaces, we found that the more toxic butterflies were detected faster than less toxic butterflies, whereas there was no relationship between toxicity and detection time for ventral surfaces. These findings are consistent with previous work that suggests aposematic signals are particularly relevant when animals are in motion, since the dorsal wing surface of butterflies-the more detectable side-is usually visible during flight rather than at rest. We also found that more toxic butterflies were more similar between dorsal and ventral detection, suggesting that greater levels of toxicity are communicated both ventrally and dorsally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73357
Primary Topic
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human ‘Predators’?

Donald James McLean, Marilia Fernandes Erickson, Marie Elisabeth Herberstein
Ecology and Evolution
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
article

Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human ‘Predators’?

Donald James McLean, Marilia Fernandes Erickson, Marie Elisabeth Herberstein
article en

Abstract

mortality assays on over 420 individuals from 61 species. Specifically, we tested (1) if the detectability of dorsal or ventral butterfly wings was related to toxicity, and (2) if butterflies that were more toxic had similar dorsal and ventral detectability. For dorsal surfaces, we found that the more toxic butterflies were detected faster than less toxic butterflies, whereas there was no relationship between toxicity and detection time for ventral surfaces. These findings are consistent with previous work that suggests aposematic signals are particularly relevant when animals are in motion, since the dorsal wing surface of butterflies-the more detectable side-is usually visible during flight rather than at rest. We also found that more toxic butterflies were more similar between dorsal and ventral detection, suggesting that greater levels of toxicity are communicated both ventrally and dorsally.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(4)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Leibniz Association (DE), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.