Evaluating cyber resilience frameworks for e-government: applicability of NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001 and COBIT 2019 in developing country contexts

Purpose This paper aims to examine three cybersecurity and governance frameworks, namely, NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and COBIT 2019, in relation to South Africa’s e-government systems. It explores how context-sensitive integration of global standards may inform cyber resilience thinking in developing-country public-sector environments, with relevance to reducing digital inequalities (SDG 10) and supporting sustainable urban digital infrastructure (SDG 11). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative, literature-based comparative evaluation is used. The frameworks are assessed against analytically derived dimensions, including governance alignment, operational usability, adaptability, resource and capacity sensitivity, resilience orientation and performance monitoring. Peer-reviewed literature, framework documentation and policy sources inform the conceptual comparative analysis. Findings The analysis indicates that no single framework is sufficient in isolation. NIST CSF 2.0 contributes modularity and adaptability, ISO/IEC 27001 provides structured controls and continuous improvement mechanisms, and COBIT 2019 embeds governance and oversight. Their complementary characteristics inform the development of a conceptual hybrid cyber resilience framework. Research limitations/implications The study is conceptual and literature-based. An empirical investigation through practitioner engagement or case-based analysis is required to examine contextual feasibility and operational relevance. Practical implications The proposed hybrid framework serves as a conceptual reference model to inform policy dialogue, institutional analysis and future empirical research on cybersecurity governance. Social implications The study contributes to discussions on inclusive access to secure e-government services and resilient digital public infrastructure, with relevance to SDG 10 and SDG 11. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study provides one of the first literature-based comparative evaluations of NIST CSF 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and COBIT 2019 within a developing-country e-government context, contributing a conceptually grounded hybrid framework for cyber resilience analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Computer Security
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-09-2025-0376
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating cyber resilience frameworks for e-government: applicability of NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001 and COBIT 2019 in developing country contexts

Willard Munyoka, Armstrong Kadyamatimba, Thifhindulwi Maxwell Rambau, Letlibe Jacob Phahlamohlaka
Information and Computer Security
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Evaluating cyber resilience frameworks for e-government: applicability of NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001 and COBIT 2019 in developing country contexts

Willard Munyoka, Armstrong Kadyamatimba, Thifhindulwi Maxwell Rambau, Letlibe Jacob Phahlamohlaka
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine three cybersecurity and governance frameworks, namely, NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and COBIT 2019, in relation to South Africa’s e-government systems. It explores how context-sensitive integration of global standards may inform cyber resilience thinking in developing-country public-sector environments, with relevance to reducing digital inequalities (SDG 10) and supporting sustainable urban digital infrastructure (SDG 11). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative, literature-based comparative evaluation is used. The frameworks are assessed against analytically derived dimensions, including governance alignment, operational usability, adaptability, resource and capacity sensitivity, resilience orientation and performance monitoring. Peer-reviewed literature, framework documentation and policy sources inform the conceptual comparative analysis. Findings The analysis indicates that no single framework is sufficient in isolation. NIST CSF 2.0 contributes modularity and adaptability, ISO/IEC 27001 provides structured controls and continuous improvement mechanisms, and COBIT 2019 embeds governance and oversight. Their complementary characteristics inform the development of a conceptual hybrid cyber resilience framework. Research limitations/implications The study is conceptual and literature-based. An empirical investigation through practitioner engagement or case-based analysis is required to examine contextual feasibility and operational relevance. Practical implications The proposed hybrid framework serves as a conceptual reference model to inform policy dialogue, institutional analysis and future empirical research on cybersecurity governance. Social implications The study contributes to discussions on inclusive access to secure e-government services and resilient digital public infrastructure, with relevance to SDG 10 and SDG 11. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study provides one of the first literature-based comparative evaluations of NIST CSF 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and COBIT 2019 within a developing-country e-government context, contributing a conceptually grounded hybrid framework for cyber resilience analysis.

Information and Computer Security
University of Venda (ZA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.