The Price of Prestige: Fees and Rankings in European Higher Education

ABSTRACT University rankings powerfully shape strategy and policy, yet they say little about what students pay. This paper introduces a simple, replicable benchmark that juxtaposes posted undergraduate fees with rank positions for 112 European universities listed in both ARWU and THE WUR (2018). Using a combined rank indicator and descriptive comparisons, we show a pronounced decoupling: low‐fee institutions appear span the rank spectrum, whereas many high‐fee providers are not clustered at the top. This pattern challenges the assumption that prestige reliably signals value and offers stakeholders a transparent way to read price alongside position. The contribution is methodological and policy‐relevant: a tractable tool that applicants, institutions, and regulators can adopt to improve price transparency and temper ranking‐driven governance. Although designed as an exploratory case, the approach scales readily to multiple years, programmes, and realised outcomes, paving the way for evidence‐informed evaluations of value for money.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70126
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Price of Prestige: Fees and Rankings in European Higher Education

Andrea Saltelli, Rosario Scandurra, Alexandra Theben
Higher Education Quarterly
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

The Price of Prestige: Fees and Rankings in European Higher Education

Andrea Saltelli, Rosario Scandurra, Alexandra Theben
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT University rankings powerfully shape strategy and policy, yet they say little about what students pay. This paper introduces a simple, replicable benchmark that juxtaposes posted undergraduate fees with rank positions for 112 European universities listed in both ARWU and THE WUR (2018). Using a combined rank indicator and descriptive comparisons, we show a pronounced decoupling: low‐fee institutions appear span the rank spectrum, whereas many high‐fee providers are not clustered at the top. This pattern challenges the assumption that prestige reliably signals value and offers stakeholders a transparent way to read price alongside position. The contribution is methodological and policy‐relevant: a tractable tool that applicants, institutions, and regulators can adopt to improve price transparency and temper ranking‐driven governance. Although designed as an exploratory case, the approach scales readily to multiple years, programmes, and realised outcomes, paving the way for evidence‐informed evaluations of value for money.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 80(2)
Barcelona School of Economics (ES), UPF Barcelona School of Management (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Price of Prestige: Fees and Rankings in European Higher Education — Andrea Saltelli, Rosario Scandurra, et al. · Higher Education Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS