Benchmarking genomic foundation models for binary classification of gene fusion breakpoints from DNA sequences

Gene fusions are critical drivers of oncogenesis and diagnostic biomarkers in various cancers. However, their detection from RNA or DNA sequencing, when performed using traditional analytical methods, encounters challenges related to sample quality, computational complexity, and noise. Although deep learning is more robust, it usually requires large labeled datasets and substantial training resources. Genomic foundation models (GFMs), which are pre-trained on pangenome-scale data, offer a promising solution to these issues. This study presents the first comprehensive benchmark of four transformer-based GFMs, Nucleotide Transformer (NT), Evo2, HyenaDNA, and DNABERT2, for the classification of gene fusion breakpoints. Using the curated FusionAI dataset of ~ 52,000 sequences, we extracted embeddings from 10-kilobase-pair (kbp) DNA sequences surrounding fusion breakpoints. We evaluated the quality of these representations qualitatively using t-SNE visualization and quantitatively by training lightweight classifiers (Support Vector Machines and simple Neural Networks) on the fixed embeddings. NT achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 0.967 and an F1 score of 0.967. This result outperformed the dedicated deep learning baseline (FusionAI, with an accuracy of 0.894). Evo2 was the second-best performer (accuracy: 0.920), demonstrating robustness derived from evolutionary pretraining. Conversely, DNABERT2 failed to compete (accuracy 0.677–0.723). Furthermore, sample efficiency analysis revealed that NT required only ~ 2,600 samples to reach 95% of its peak performance, whereas the baseline required over 14,000 samples. These findings demonstrate that advanced GFMs, particularly the NT and Evo2 models, generate highly discriminative ‘out-of-the-box’ embeddings. These embeddings significantly outperform dedicated deep learning baselines while requiring a fraction of the training data and computational time. This suggests that GFMs could be a scalable, data-efficient way of developing precise genomic diagnostic tools, particularly for rare diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioData Mining
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-026-00553-1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking genomic foundation models for binary classification of gene fusion breakpoints from DNA sequences

Radim Krupička, Ondřej Klempíř, Bohuslav Dvorský, Kateřina Kollinová et al.
BioData Mining
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
article

Benchmarking genomic foundation models for binary classification of gene fusion breakpoints from DNA sequences

Radim Krupička, Ondřej Klempíř, Bohuslav Dvorský, Kateřina Kollinová, Mariana Komárková
article en

Abstract

Gene fusions are critical drivers of oncogenesis and diagnostic biomarkers in various cancers. However, their detection from RNA or DNA sequencing, when performed using traditional analytical methods, encounters challenges related to sample quality, computational complexity, and noise. Although deep learning is more robust, it usually requires large labeled datasets and substantial training resources. Genomic foundation models (GFMs), which are pre-trained on pangenome-scale data, offer a promising solution to these issues. This study presents the first comprehensive benchmark of four transformer-based GFMs, Nucleotide Transformer (NT), Evo2, HyenaDNA, and DNABERT2, for the classification of gene fusion breakpoints. Using the curated FusionAI dataset of ~ 52,000 sequences, we extracted embeddings from 10-kilobase-pair (kbp) DNA sequences surrounding fusion breakpoints. We evaluated the quality of these representations qualitatively using t-SNE visualization and quantitatively by training lightweight classifiers (Support Vector Machines and simple Neural Networks) on the fixed embeddings. NT achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 0.967 and an F1 score of 0.967. This result outperformed the dedicated deep learning baseline (FusionAI, with an accuracy of 0.894). Evo2 was the second-best performer (accuracy: 0.920), demonstrating robustness derived from evolutionary pretraining. Conversely, DNABERT2 failed to compete (accuracy 0.677–0.723). Furthermore, sample efficiency analysis revealed that NT required only ~ 2,600 samples to reach 95% of its peak performance, whereas the baseline required over 14,000 samples. These findings demonstrate that advanced GFMs, particularly the NT and Evo2 models, generate highly discriminative ‘out-of-the-box’ embeddings. These embeddings significantly outperform dedicated deep learning baselines while requiring a fraction of the training data and computational time. This suggests that GFMs could be a scalable, data-efficient way of developing precise genomic diagnostic tools, particularly for rare diseases.

BioData Mining
Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion (CZ), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.