Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase Impacts Response Rates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Exploring Response to Elafibranor in <scp>ELATIVE</scp>

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels can influence the likelihood of achieving dichotomous biochemical response criteria in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This concept was explored using Week 52 data from the phase III ELATIVE trial (NCT04526665), which assessed elafibranor, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ agonist approved as a second-line treatment for PBC. METHODS: Patients were grouped by baseline ALP. Outcomes assessed: biochemical response, ALP normalization, ALP change from baseline (CfB), transplant-free survival (using GLOBE score). RESULTS: At Week 52, biochemical response was achieved across all subgroups receiving elafibranor (≤ 2× upper limit of normal [ULN]: 86.7%, > 2-≤ 2.5× ULN: 80.0%, > 2.5-≤ 3× ULN: 52.0%, > 3-≤ 4× ULN: 22.2%, > 4× ULN: 18.8%), and one subgroup receiving placebo (≤ 2× ULN: 13.3%). ALP normalization occurred only with elafibranor (≤ 2× ULN: 53.3%, > 2-≤ 2.5× ULN: 12.0%, > 2.5-≤ 3× ULN: 12.0%, > 4× ULN: 12.5%). Mean ALP reductions were consistent across subgroups receiving elafibranor (overall CfB: -38.9%). Patients receiving elafibranor, regardless of biochemical response, had similar reductions in risk of liver transplant and/or liver-related mortality within 15 years (-4.0% to -4.5%); among patients receiving placebo, reduced risk was only predicted in responders (-1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In ELATIVE, lower baseline ALP correlated with higher biochemical response and ALP normalization rates with elafibranor. However, among patients receiving elafibranor, relative reductions in risk scores and ALP were consistent regardless of biochemical response and pre-treatment ALP, indicating treatment benefit. Similar biochemical benefits were not observed among patients receiving placebo. These results support evaluating continuous measures and prognostic scores alongside dichotomous criteria to comprehensively assess efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04526665.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver International
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70630
Primary Topic
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase Impacts Response Rates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Exploring Response to Elafibranor in ELATIVE

J. Shu, Claudia O. Zein, Eric Lawitz, Benjamin Miller et al.
Liver International
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
article

Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase Impacts Response Rates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Exploring Response to Elafibranor in ELATIVE

J. Shu, Claudia O. Zein, Eric Lawitz, Benjamin Miller, Cynthia Levy, Kris V. Kowdley, Nuno Antunes, Christopher L. Bowlus
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels can influence the likelihood of achieving dichotomous biochemical response criteria in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This concept was explored using Week 52 data from the phase III ELATIVE trial (NCT04526665), which assessed elafibranor, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ agonist approved as a second-line treatment for PBC. METHODS: Patients were grouped by baseline ALP. Outcomes assessed: biochemical response, ALP normalization, ALP change from baseline (CfB), transplant-free survival (using GLOBE score). RESULTS: At Week 52, biochemical response was achieved across all subgroups receiving elafibranor (≤ 2× upper limit of normal [ULN]: 86.7%, > 2-≤ 2.5× ULN: 80.0%, > 2.5-≤ 3× ULN: 52.0%, > 3-≤ 4× ULN: 22.2%, > 4× ULN: 18.8%), and one subgroup receiving placebo (≤ 2× ULN: 13.3%). ALP normalization occurred only with elafibranor (≤ 2× ULN: 53.3%, > 2-≤ 2.5× ULN: 12.0%, > 2.5-≤ 3× ULN: 12.0%, > 4× ULN: 12.5%). Mean ALP reductions were consistent across subgroups receiving elafibranor (overall CfB: -38.9%). Patients receiving elafibranor, regardless of biochemical response, had similar reductions in risk of liver transplant and/or liver-related mortality within 15 years (-4.0% to -4.5%); among patients receiving placebo, reduced risk was only predicted in responders (-1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In ELATIVE, lower baseline ALP correlated with higher biochemical response and ALP normalization rates with elafibranor. However, among patients receiving elafibranor, relative reductions in risk scores and ALP were consistent regardless of biochemical response and pre-treatment ALP, indicating treatment benefit. Similar biochemical benefits were not observed among patients receiving placebo. These results support evaluating continuous measures and prognostic scores alongside dichotomous criteria to comprehensively assess efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04526665.

Liver InternationalVol. 46(5)
University of Miami (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Miami Health System (US), Liver Institute Northwest (US), Texas Liver Institute (US), Ipsen (United States) (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Ipsen
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.