THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF GEOMETRIZATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory, by Ilija Barukčić, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Ilija Barukčić’s The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates Barukčić’s proposal that the four fundamental fields of nature may be unified through geometrization, interpreting mass, charge, energy, and interaction as expressions of spacetime geometry. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, the article identifies important structural compatibilities, especially in the rejection of naive materialism and in the search for a deeper unifying order behind observable physics. At the same time, it argues that the geometrical proposal remains modally insufficient as an account of absolute origin, since geometry, in TO, must be understood as a derived layer of manifestation rather than the first principle of reality. The article develops this confrontation through the modal discipline of TO, articulating the discussion with phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem of the Theory of Objectivity, and its cosmological Eras. It also incorporates the understanding of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. In this sense, the study proposes that geometrization may be reclassified, under TO, as a late-regime formal grammar of already stabilized relational and phenomenic processes. By placing Barukčić’s preprint in dialogue with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent developments on modal ontology and testability, and a broader support bibliography in physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science, the article offers both a critique and a constructive pathway. Its central thesis is that geometrization has theoretical value, but only when disciplined as a secondary and regional expression of a more fundamental modal-relational ontology. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Modal Ontology; Unified Field Theory; Geometrization; Ilija Barukčić; Philosophy of Physics; Cosmology; Phenomenic Elements; Inductive Effects; Cosmogonic Theorem; Foundations of Physics; Spacetime Geometry; Ontological Physics; Critical-Propositional Analysis; Zenodo

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19445657
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF GEOMETRIZATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory, by Ilija Barukčić, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF GEOMETRIZATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory, by Ilija Barukčić, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Ilija Barukčić’s The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates Barukčić’s proposal that the four fundamental fields of nature may be unified through geometrization, interpreting mass, charge, energy, and interaction as expressions of spacetime geometry. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, the article identifies important structural compatibilities, especially in the rejection of naive materialism and in the search for a deeper unifying order behind observable physics. At the same time, it argues that the geometrical proposal remains modally insufficient as an account of absolute origin, since geometry, in TO, must be understood as a derived layer of manifestation rather than the first principle of reality. The article develops this confrontation through the modal discipline of TO, articulating the discussion with phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem of the Theory of Objectivity, and its cosmological Eras. It also incorporates the understanding of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. In this sense, the study proposes that geometrization may be reclassified, under TO, as a late-regime formal grammar of already stabilized relational and phenomenic processes. By placing Barukčić’s preprint in dialogue with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent developments on modal ontology and testability, and a broader support bibliography in physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science, the article offers both a critique and a constructive pathway. Its central thesis is that geometrization has theoretical value, but only when disciplined as a secondary and regional expression of a more fundamental modal-relational ontology. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Modal Ontology; Unified Field Theory; Geometrization; Ilija Barukčić; Philosophy of Physics; Cosmology; Phenomenic Elements; Inductive Effects; Cosmogonic Theorem; Foundations of Physics; Spacetime Geometry; Ontological Physics; Critical-Propositional Analysis; Zenodo

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF GEOMETRIZATION: a critical–propositional analysis of The Geometrization of Unified Field Theory, by Ilija Barukčić, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity — Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS