Anthropogenic disturbance modifies spatial patterns of reef sharks

Abstract Anthropogenic activities are degrading coral reef ecosystems and driving global declines in reef‐associated sharks and rays, yet the role of non‐extractive human disturbance such as tourism and coastal development remains poorly understood. We quantified how environmental conditions and human presence shape reef shark and ray distributions across seven Caribbean reef systems using 995 Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) deployments conducted between 2012 and 2017 across six inhabited Dutch Caribbean islands and the remote Saba Bank. Habitat characteristics and proxies of human pressure were quantified for each site, including coastal building density and SCUBA diving activity derived from geotagged social media data. We recorded 455 elasmobranchs, dominated by Caribbean reef sharks ( Carcharhinus perezi ), southern stingrays ( Hypanus americanus ) and nurse sharks ( Ginglymostoma cirratum ). Reef shark abundance declined sharply with increasing coastal development and diving intensity on populated reefs despite otherwise suitable habitat conditions, whereas nurse sharks and southern stingrays were less sensitive to human activity and more strongly associated with habitat features. In contrast, on the minimally disturbed Saba Bank, elasmobranch distributions were primarily explained by environmental gradients such as depth and habitat complexity. Synthesis and applications : Species‐specific sensitivities mean that non‐extractive human presence can strongly reshape reef predator distributions even where fishing pressure is limited. Integrating tourism intensity and coastal development into marine spatial planning is therefore essential for reef shark conservation, and combining ecological surveys with open‐source social and spatial datasets provides a scalable, low‐cost approach for assessing human disturbance in data‐limited reef systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70330
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropogenic disturbance modifies spatial patterns of reef sharks

L.A.J. Nagelkerke, Twan Stoffers, Jimmy van Rijn, H.V. Winter et al.
Journal of Applied Ecology
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
article

Anthropogenic disturbance modifies spatial patterns of reef sharks

L.A.J. Nagelkerke, Twan Stoffers, Jimmy van Rijn, H.V. Winter, Mark E. Bond, Michael R. Heithaus, Chris C. Duinmeijer, Jan Jaap Poos, Stijn Schep, Tadzio Y. Bervoets, Matthew Needle, Georgios Papageorgiou, Martin de Graaf
article en

Abstract

Abstract Anthropogenic activities are degrading coral reef ecosystems and driving global declines in reef‐associated sharks and rays, yet the role of non‐extractive human disturbance such as tourism and coastal development remains poorly understood. We quantified how environmental conditions and human presence shape reef shark and ray distributions across seven Caribbean reef systems using 995 Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) deployments conducted between 2012 and 2017 across six inhabited Dutch Caribbean islands and the remote Saba Bank. Habitat characteristics and proxies of human pressure were quantified for each site, including coastal building density and SCUBA diving activity derived from geotagged social media data. We recorded 455 elasmobranchs, dominated by Caribbean reef sharks ( Carcharhinus perezi ), southern stingrays ( Hypanus americanus ) and nurse sharks ( Ginglymostoma cirratum ). Reef shark abundance declined sharply with increasing coastal development and diving intensity on populated reefs despite otherwise suitable habitat conditions, whereas nurse sharks and southern stingrays were less sensitive to human activity and more strongly associated with habitat features. In contrast, on the minimally disturbed Saba Bank, elasmobranch distributions were primarily explained by environmental gradients such as depth and habitat complexity. Synthesis and applications : Species‐specific sensitivities mean that non‐extractive human presence can strongly reshape reef predator distributions even where fishing pressure is limited. Integrating tourism intensity and coastal development into marine spatial planning is therefore essential for reef shark conservation, and combining ecological surveys with open‐source social and spatial datasets provides a scalable, low‐cost approach for assessing human disturbance in data‐limited reef systems.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 63(4)
Northeastern University (US), University of Groningen (NL), Florida International University (US), Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of the Commonwealth Caribbean (JM), International University School of Medicine (BQ), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE), Geospatial Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.