Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency or Microwave Ablation and Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors

Background and objectives Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >5 cm is problematic, as patients are often outside transplantation criteria, and cirrhosis compromises curative resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival following treatment with ablation compared to chemotherapy in large HCC. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant User File from 2004 to 2017. Patients with HCC >5 cm in diameter treated with ablation versus chemotherapy alone were compared. Inverse probability-weighted propensity scores were used to model treatment assignments in the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 14,783 HCC patients with tumors >5 cm and <9 cm were treated with chemotherapy (N=14,127) or ablation (n=656). After adjustment for stage, comorbidity, insurance status, facility type, and race, survival was significantly improved with ablation. The treatment effect of ablation was estimated using inverse-probability-weighted propensity scores, and the survival advantage was 19 months longer (p<0.001; 95% CI: 10.1-28.2) compared to chemotherapy. Conclusions Despite the reluctance to use ablation in lesions >5 cm, our analysis suggests a survival advantage when compared to chemotherapy. These results are promising, and future trials should evaluate ablation in combination with other local and systemic therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106552
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency or Microwave Ablation and Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors

Jennifer M. Bailey, Putao Cen, Artem Boyev, Nirav C Thosani et al.
Cureus
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency or Microwave Ablation and Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors

Jennifer M. Bailey, Putao Cen, Artem Boyev, Nirav C Thosani, Curtis J. Wray, Julie Rowe
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >5 cm is problematic, as patients are often outside transplantation criteria, and cirrhosis compromises curative resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival following treatment with ablation compared to chemotherapy in large HCC. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant User File from 2004 to 2017. Patients with HCC >5 cm in diameter treated with ablation versus chemotherapy alone were compared. Inverse probability-weighted propensity scores were used to model treatment assignments in the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 14,783 HCC patients with tumors >5 cm and <9 cm were treated with chemotherapy (N=14,127) or ablation (n=656). After adjustment for stage, comorbidity, insurance status, facility type, and race, survival was significantly improved with ablation. The treatment effect of ablation was estimated using inverse-probability-weighted propensity scores, and the survival advantage was 19 months longer (p<0.001; 95% CI: 10.1-28.2) compared to chemotherapy. Conclusions Despite the reluctance to use ablation in lesions >5 cm, our analysis suggests a survival advantage when compared to chemotherapy. These results are promising, and future trials should evaluate ablation in combination with other local and systemic therapies.

CureusVol. 18(4)
The University of Texas Health Science Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.