Understanding problematic versus non-problematic chemsex practices from a user's perspective: a qualitative study

Chemsex is predominantly reported among men who have sex with men (MSM) and plays an important role in HIV transmission and prevention, being associated with heightened vulnerability to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. While often used recreationally, chemsex is linked to physical and mental health harms. This study explores how participants define problematic chemsex and perceive contributing and protective factors. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted among MSM who had used at least one chemsex substance defined in this study. Participants were recruited between January and September 2023 through the Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Centre for Sexual Health, the Netherlands. Among 27 participants (median age 37 years, range 20-62), problematic chemsex was characterised by loss of control affecting daily life, boundaries, emotional regulation, safety, health and reliance on drugs for sex. Contributing factors included coping with mental distress, lack of purpose, escalating use and injecting. Protective factors included self-imposed limits, fear of consequences, learning from experience and being in a steady relationship. Problematic chemsex appears influenced by interactions between psychological well-being, sense of purpose and substance use patterns. These indicators may inform quantifiable measures and improve chemsex-related support and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Care
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2026.2633293
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding problematic versus non-problematic chemsex practices from a user's perspective: a qualitative study

E. Hoornenborg, Udi Davidovich, Titia Heijman, Doortje A.C. van den Dungen et al.
AIDS Care
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Understanding problematic versus non-problematic chemsex practices from a user's perspective: a qualitative study

E. Hoornenborg, Udi Davidovich, Titia Heijman, Doortje A.C. van den Dungen, Henry J.C. de Vries
article en

Abstract

Chemsex is predominantly reported among men who have sex with men (MSM) and plays an important role in HIV transmission and prevention, being associated with heightened vulnerability to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. While often used recreationally, chemsex is linked to physical and mental health harms. This study explores how participants define problematic chemsex and perceive contributing and protective factors. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted among MSM who had used at least one chemsex substance defined in this study. Participants were recruited between January and September 2023 through the Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Centre for Sexual Health, the Netherlands. Among 27 participants (median age 37 years, range 20-62), problematic chemsex was characterised by loss of control affecting daily life, boundaries, emotional regulation, safety, health and reliance on drugs for sex. Contributing factors included coping with mental distress, lack of purpose, escalating use and injecting. Protective factors included self-imposed limits, fear of consequences, learning from experience and being in a steady relationship. Problematic chemsex appears influenced by interactions between psychological well-being, sense of purpose and substance use patterns. These indicators may inform quantifiable measures and improve chemsex-related support and interventions.

AIDS Care
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.