Data-driven estimation of core body temperature during physical activity under heat exposure: A systematic review and standardized evaluation

Accurate, real-time estimation of core body temperature (CBT) during physical activity is essential for monitoring heat strain and mitigating the risk of heat-related illness under hot environmental conditions. Although numerous data-driven algorithms using wearable sensors have been proposed, their practical reliability remains unclear due to substantial methodological heterogeneity and the absence of standardized evaluation. This study combined a systematic review with a standardized quantitative benchmark. A total of 38 studies employing non-invasive inputs for CBT estimation were identified. Of these, 14 eligible models, including Kalman filter–based methods, statistical models, and machine-learning approaches, were re-implemented and evaluated under identical preprocessing and evaluation settings using two independent datasets: Dataset 1 (treadmill walking, ) and Dataset 2 (cycling, ). The benchmark revealed notable differences between originally reported performance and reproduced performance under standardized conditions. For the widely used heart-rate–based extended Kalman filter, the root mean square error (RMSE) increased from typically reported values of 0.21–0.41 C to 0.41 C on Dataset 1 and 0.66 C on Dataset 2. Incorporating skin temperature improved tracking accuracy in some configurations, but performance gains were highly dependent on measurement site and dataset. Sensitivity for detecting elevated CBT ( 38.0 C) varied markedly across methods, particularly for the cycling protocol. In conclusion, no single CBT estimation approach consistently outperformed others across all settings. Heart-rate–only models provided a stable baseline under limited sensing conditions, whereas multimodal approaches offered conditional benefits in more controlled scenarios. This work establishes a standardized benchmark framework to support fair comparison, method selection, and future development of (wearable) CBT estimation technologies. • Systematic review of core temperature estimation during physical activity in hot environments. • Standardized benchmark across two controlled heat-exposure datasets reveals strong dataset dependence. • Results inform deployment of wearable heat-strain monitoring in occupational and built-environment settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2026.114591
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven estimation of core body temperature during physical activity under heat exposure: A systematic review and standardized evaluation

Yuanzhe Zhao, Jeroen HM Bergmann, Weihao Li
Building and Environment
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Data-driven estimation of core body temperature during physical activity under heat exposure: A systematic review and standardized evaluation

Yuanzhe Zhao, Jeroen HM Bergmann, Weihao Li
article en

Abstract

Accurate, real-time estimation of core body temperature (CBT) during physical activity is essential for monitoring heat strain and mitigating the risk of heat-related illness under hot environmental conditions. Although numerous data-driven algorithms using wearable sensors have been proposed, their practical reliability remains unclear due to substantial methodological heterogeneity and the absence of standardized evaluation. This study combined a systematic review with a standardized quantitative benchmark. A total of 38 studies employing non-invasive inputs for CBT estimation were identified. Of these, 14 eligible models, including Kalman filter–based methods, statistical models, and machine-learning approaches, were re-implemented and evaluated under identical preprocessing and evaluation settings using two independent datasets: Dataset 1 (treadmill walking, ) and Dataset 2 (cycling, ). The benchmark revealed notable differences between originally reported performance and reproduced performance under standardized conditions. For the widely used heart-rate–based extended Kalman filter, the root mean square error (RMSE) increased from typically reported values of 0.21–0.41 C to 0.41 C on Dataset 1 and 0.66 C on Dataset 2. Incorporating skin temperature improved tracking accuracy in some configurations, but performance gains were highly dependent on measurement site and dataset. Sensitivity for detecting elevated CBT ( 38.0 C) varied markedly across methods, particularly for the cycling protocol. In conclusion, no single CBT estimation approach consistently outperformed others across all settings. Heart-rate–only models provided a stable baseline under limited sensing conditions, whereas multimodal approaches offered conditional benefits in more controlled scenarios. This work establishes a standardized benchmark framework to support fair comparison, method selection, and future development of (wearable) CBT estimation technologies. • Systematic review of core temperature estimation during physical activity in hot environments. • Standardized benchmark across two controlled heat-exposure datasets reveals strong dataset dependence. • Results inform deployment of wearable heat-strain monitoring in occupational and built-environment settings.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 297
University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Oxford (GB), Beihang University (CN)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.