Experimental evaluation of sustainable ground improvement techniques

The effectiveness and durability of some ground improvement methods, such as cement stabilizer, lime stabilizer, microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP), geopolymers, and recycled materials, are evaluated. The improvement in engineering properties of soil, including strength (UCS), permeability, and durability, is quantified experimentally. For the strength of waste glass/MB modified backfills, the maximum strength is achieved for cement stabilization (6.0 MPa), and the minimum strength is obtained in terms of lime stabilization (2.9 MPa). MICP and geopolymers UCS were observed at 0.8 mPa and 1.0 mPa, while the values of UCS were lowest in the case of recycled materials, which is 1.5 MPa. In terms of permeability, cement stabilization can lower it up to 1e-6 cm/s, whereas in comparison with MICP and geopolymers, both could withhold at 2e-4 cm/s, 3e-5 cm/s, and 4.5e-5 cm/s, respectively. The permeability test on the recycled products was approximately 1.8E-4 cm/s. The cement stabilization was better in addition to freeze-thaw cycles, allowing up to about 85% over geopolymers (75%) and lime stabilization (70%). The ratio of requests under MICP vs. recycled materials was 60% and 50%, respectively. CS was identified as the most environmentally impactful while having the highest carbon profile at 1500 kg/t, and RM as the process with the least CO? footprint, reaching a minimum of 100 kg/ton. The raw material cost for CS was $150/t, and for RM, raw materials were much cheaper, approximately around $50/ton. The results of the study report that recyclable materials with cement stabilization will make an alternative in terms of sustainability and low-cost options particularly in comparison with conventional materials based on strength and durability performance qualities. The focus of future work needs to be on field-scale applications, optimization of bio-based treatment, and specification of a combined solution that will be advantageous of both well-developed methods and green solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v8i1.2028
Primary Topic
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evaluation of sustainable ground improvement techniques

Ahmed Muhammad Dakhil, Isra’a M. Mohsin
Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
article

Experimental evaluation of sustainable ground improvement techniques

Ahmed Muhammad Dakhil, Isra’a M. Mohsin
article en

Abstract

The effectiveness and durability of some ground improvement methods, such as cement stabilizer, lime stabilizer, microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP), geopolymers, and recycled materials, are evaluated. The improvement in engineering properties of soil, including strength (UCS), permeability, and durability, is quantified experimentally. For the strength of waste glass/MB modified backfills, the maximum strength is achieved for cement stabilization (6.0 MPa), and the minimum strength is obtained in terms of lime stabilization (2.9 MPa). MICP and geopolymers UCS were observed at 0.8 mPa and 1.0 mPa, while the values of UCS were lowest in the case of recycled materials, which is 1.5 MPa. In terms of permeability, cement stabilization can lower it up to 1e-6 cm/s, whereas in comparison with MICP and geopolymers, both could withhold at 2e-4 cm/s, 3e-5 cm/s, and 4.5e-5 cm/s, respectively. The permeability test on the recycled products was approximately 1.8E-4 cm/s. The cement stabilization was better in addition to freeze-thaw cycles, allowing up to about 85% over geopolymers (75%) and lime stabilization (70%). The ratio of requests under MICP vs. recycled materials was 60% and 50%, respectively. CS was identified as the most environmentally impactful while having the highest carbon profile at 1500 kg/t, and RM as the process with the least CO? footprint, reaching a minimum of 100 kg/ton. The raw material cost for CS was $150/t, and for RM, raw materials were much cheaper, approximately around $50/ton. The results of the study report that recyclable materials with cement stabilization will make an alternative in terms of sustainability and low-cost options particularly in comparison with conventional materials based on strength and durability performance qualities. The focus of future work needs to be on field-scale applications, optimization of bio-based treatment, and specification of a combined solution that will be advantageous of both well-developed methods and green solutions.

Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554Vol. 8(1)
University of Wasit (IQ)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.