Assessing the impact of ice thickness uncertainty on future glacier evolution in the Himalayas using a higher-order glacier flow model

• Differences among thickness datasets lead to a standard deviation of 1.5%–6.2% in projected volume loss. • Central Himalayas glaciers show highest sensitivity to ice thickness uncertainties. • High-order flowline model amplifies glacier response to initial ice geometry variations. Understanding future glacier evolution in the Himalayas is essential for anticipating changes in regional water resources. However, significant uncertainty remains due to differences in the glacier ice thickness datasets used to initialize projection models. This study investigates the influence of ice thickness uncertainty on modeled glacier changes using a higher-order flowline model. We simulate the future evolution of 30 glaciers across the western, central, and eastern Himalayas under a committed climate scenario, assuming constant climate conditions from 1991 to 2020. Seven widely used global ice thickness datasets are applied to assess their impact on projections of glacier thickness, volume, and surface velocity. By 2100, glaciers are projected to lose an average of 23.4 ± 3.7 m in thickness, 0.10 ± 0.02 km 3 in volume, and 0.67 ± 0.54 m a −1 in surface velocity. Differences among thickness datasets lead to a standard deviation of 1.5%–6.2% in projected volume loss, with larger divergence in the central Himalaya. The inter-dataset variability decreases with glacier elevation and size, whereas smaller and lower-elevation glaciers remain more sensitive to initial thickness differences. Although the overall magnitude of uncertainty is moderate, its influence persists throughout the century and is comparable to, that from climate model resolution. The use of a higher-order model further amplifies these differences due to its sensitivity to initial geometry. These findings highlight the need for improved thickness observations and emphasize the importance of incorporating multiple thickness datasets in regional glacier modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135450
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of ice thickness uncertainty on future glacier evolution in the Himalayas using a higher-order glacier flow model

Baojuan Huai, Yuzhe Wang, Xiaoning Qi, Tong Zhang et al.
Journal of Hydrology
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Assessing the impact of ice thickness uncertainty on future glacier evolution in the Himalayas using a higher-order glacier flow model

Baojuan Huai, Yuzhe Wang, Xiaoning Qi, Tong Zhang, Weijun Sun, Lei Wang, Hongmin An
article en

Abstract

• Differences among thickness datasets lead to a standard deviation of 1.5%–6.2% in projected volume loss. • Central Himalayas glaciers show highest sensitivity to ice thickness uncertainties. • High-order flowline model amplifies glacier response to initial ice geometry variations. Understanding future glacier evolution in the Himalayas is essential for anticipating changes in regional water resources. However, significant uncertainty remains due to differences in the glacier ice thickness datasets used to initialize projection models. This study investigates the influence of ice thickness uncertainty on modeled glacier changes using a higher-order flowline model. We simulate the future evolution of 30 glaciers across the western, central, and eastern Himalayas under a committed climate scenario, assuming constant climate conditions from 1991 to 2020. Seven widely used global ice thickness datasets are applied to assess their impact on projections of glacier thickness, volume, and surface velocity. By 2100, glaciers are projected to lose an average of 23.4 ± 3.7 m in thickness, 0.10 ± 0.02 km 3 in volume, and 0.67 ± 0.54 m a −1 in surface velocity. Differences among thickness datasets lead to a standard deviation of 1.5%–6.2% in projected volume loss, with larger divergence in the central Himalaya. The inter-dataset variability decreases with glacier elevation and size, whereas smaller and lower-elevation glaciers remain more sensitive to initial thickness differences. Although the overall magnitude of uncertainty is moderate, its influence persists throughout the century and is comparable to, that from climate model resolution. The use of a higher-order model further amplifies these differences due to its sensitivity to initial geometry. These findings highlight the need for improved thickness observations and emphasize the importance of incorporating multiple thickness datasets in regional glacier modeling.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 673
Beijing Normal University (CN), Shandong Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.