Threats to Humanity and Doctors' Duties

Doctors as doctors have plausible duties to do what they can to mitigate the impacts of the health system and their own practices on climate change, given that there is generally a duty to do good when one can. One objection to this claim is that the actions doctors could take fall outside doctors' specialist knowledge and legitimate ambit of influence. However, while this objection seems to apply in the case of political actions, it does not apply to actions doctors might take within medical institutions to mitigate climate impacts. A second objection is that within medical institutions, doctors should always prioritise patient care over any other duty. However, though this is true, it doesn't show that the duty in relation to the environment doesn't exist, and in practical terms, there seem likely to be opportunities to act upon it within existing day to day practice. The original claim still stands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70252
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Threats to Humanity and Doctors' Duties

Neil Pickering
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Threats to Humanity and Doctors' Duties

Neil Pickering
article en

Abstract

Doctors as doctors have plausible duties to do what they can to mitigate the impacts of the health system and their own practices on climate change, given that there is generally a duty to do good when one can. One objection to this claim is that the actions doctors could take fall outside doctors' specialist knowledge and legitimate ambit of influence. However, while this objection seems to apply in the case of political actions, it does not apply to actions doctors might take within medical institutions to mitigate climate impacts. A second objection is that within medical institutions, doctors should always prioritise patient care over any other duty. However, though this is true, it doesn't show that the duty in relation to the environment doesn't exist, and in practical terms, there seem likely to be opportunities to act upon it within existing day to day practice. The original claim still stands.

Emergency Medicine AustralasiaVol. 38(2)
University of Otago (NZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.