Influence of Hallux Valgus Varus Deformity on First Metatarsal Sagittal Inclination Assessment: A Comparison Between Weightbearing Radiography and Weightbearing Computed Tomography

Background: Radiographic assessment of the sagittal inclination of the first metatarsal (1M) is essential for evaluating foot disorders. However, 1M varus deviation may influence these measurements. This study aimed to determine whether hallux valgus (HV) varus deformity influences the sagittal radiographic inclination of the 1M by comparing weightbearing radiography (WBR) and weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images. Methods: Eighty-four feet were analyzed, including HV cases with intermetatarsal angle (IMA) >15° and control feet without HV. The sagittal inclination of the 1M, its base height, and ground lines form a rectangular scalene triangle, in which perspective changes can modify the lengths and angles of its sides. The first metatarsal declination angle (FMDA) and length of the first metatarsal (L1M) were used to assess the influence of 1M varus on sagittal alignment differences between WBR and WBCT. Results: < .05). Agreement analysis demonstrated strong concordance between WBR and WBCT measurements, indicating comparable values with minimal systematic bias. Conclusion: In patients with IMA >15°, forefoot geometric changes were reflected with modest L1M differences, although their clinical impact should be interpreted cautiously. Importantly, these changes did not affect FMDA, which remained stable across imaging modalities. The strong agreement between WBR and WBCT supports FMDA as a reliable parameter for assessing 1M sagittal alignment and planning realignment procedures, irrespective of HV severity. Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261432620
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Hallux Valgus Varus Deformity on First Metatarsal Sagittal Inclination Assessment: A Comparison Between Weightbearing Radiography and Weightbearing Computed Tomography

Danilo Ryuko Cândido Nishikawa, Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo, César de César Netto, Rodrigo Sousa Macedo et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Influence of Hallux Valgus Varus Deformity on First Metatarsal Sagittal Inclination Assessment: A Comparison Between Weightbearing Radiography and Weightbearing Computed Tomography

Danilo Ryuko Cândido Nishikawa, Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo, César de César Netto, Rodrigo Sousa Macedo, Rafael Barban Sposeto, F J Fonseca, Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos, Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur
article en

Abstract

Background: Radiographic assessment of the sagittal inclination of the first metatarsal (1M) is essential for evaluating foot disorders. However, 1M varus deviation may influence these measurements. This study aimed to determine whether hallux valgus (HV) varus deformity influences the sagittal radiographic inclination of the 1M by comparing weightbearing radiography (WBR) and weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images. Methods: Eighty-four feet were analyzed, including HV cases with intermetatarsal angle (IMA) >15° and control feet without HV. The sagittal inclination of the 1M, its base height, and ground lines form a rectangular scalene triangle, in which perspective changes can modify the lengths and angles of its sides. The first metatarsal declination angle (FMDA) and length of the first metatarsal (L1M) were used to assess the influence of 1M varus on sagittal alignment differences between WBR and WBCT. Results: < .05). Agreement analysis demonstrated strong concordance between WBR and WBCT measurements, indicating comparable values with minimal systematic bias. Conclusion: In patients with IMA >15°, forefoot geometric changes were reflected with modest L1M differences, although their clinical impact should be interpreted cautiously. Importantly, these changes did not affect FMDA, which remained stable across imaging modalities. The strong agreement between WBR and WBCT supports FMDA as a reliable parameter for assessing 1M sagittal alignment and planning realignment procedures, irrespective of HV severity. Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 11(2)
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US), Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.