VKB-Training: Epistemically and Ontologically Categorized Training Data for Hallucination Reduction in Large Language Models

Large language models hallucinate because their training data carries no epistemic metadata: facts, hypotheses, value judgments, and acknowledged unknowns occupy the same embedding space with identical weight. A deeper problem compounds this: every claim presupposes an ontology — an axiomatic framework equipped with a metric — and as Bertrand's paradox demonstrates, probability itself is ill-defined without specifying the measure. We propose VKB-Training (Verified Knowledge Base Training), a data-centric approach that assigns each training sample a six-category epistemic tag (Fact, Model, Value, Hypothesis, BlindSpot, Ontology), a calibrated confidence score, a provenance chain, and an ontology identifier specifying the axiomatic framework under which the claim is asserted. We introduce a four-stage hybrid annotation pipeline: (1) AI triangulation — multiple LLMs classify independently; inter-model disagreement signals normative content (the "Caesar/God boundary"); (2) Human sampling with axiom extraction — domain annotators resolve high-disagreement cases; recurrent decision principles are extracted as reusable rules; (3) Expert calibration with reputation weighting — formalized Galton's ox-weighing insight (per S.V.E. XI, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109198); (4) Logical consistency filters — contradiction detection and symmetry verification via the CGS Method (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18776172). Four training mechanisms are proposed: confidence-weighted loss; provenance-aware attention; a BlindSpot training objective that maximizes output entropy at known knowledge gaps; and ontology attention — a mechanism enabling the model to switch between axiomatic frameworks, with an entropy-based selection cost that balances explanatory parsimony (commit to one frame) against epistemic humility (maintain multiple frames) depending on context. Ontologies are formally defined as triples (axioms, metric, measure) and parameterized along five dimensions (core axioms, metric structure, evidential standards, scope, temporal orientation), drawing on the SES parameterization from S.V.E. XII (included as supplementary material). VKB-Training was first described as part of the CogOS framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109244). This paper extracts and formalizes the VKB component as a standalone, empirically testable proposal with a falsifiable experimental protocol and pre-specified success thresholds. Section 7 (Ethical Data Sourcing: Author Revenue Sharing, 10–50%) is included in the preprint but will be omitted from the workshop submission. [NOTE: ILLUSTRATIVE NUMBERS — WIP] Prepared for submission to NeurIPS 2025 Workshop.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19436526
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VKB-Training: Epistemically and Ontologically Categorized Training Data for Hallucination Reduction in Large Language Models

Artiom Kovnatsky
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
article

VKB-Training: Epistemically and Ontologically Categorized Training Data for Hallucination Reduction in Large Language Models

Artiom Kovnatsky
article en

Abstract

Large language models hallucinate because their training data carries no epistemic metadata: facts, hypotheses, value judgments, and acknowledged unknowns occupy the same embedding space with identical weight. A deeper problem compounds this: every claim presupposes an ontology — an axiomatic framework equipped with a metric — and as Bertrand's paradox demonstrates, probability itself is ill-defined without specifying the measure. We propose VKB-Training (Verified Knowledge Base Training), a data-centric approach that assigns each training sample a six-category epistemic tag (Fact, Model, Value, Hypothesis, BlindSpot, Ontology), a calibrated confidence score, a provenance chain, and an ontology identifier specifying the axiomatic framework under which the claim is asserted. We introduce a four-stage hybrid annotation pipeline: (1) AI triangulation — multiple LLMs classify independently; inter-model disagreement signals normative content (the "Caesar/God boundary"); (2) Human sampling with axiom extraction — domain annotators resolve high-disagreement cases; recurrent decision principles are extracted as reusable rules; (3) Expert calibration with reputation weighting — formalized Galton's ox-weighing insight (per S.V.E. XI, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109198); (4) Logical consistency filters — contradiction detection and symmetry verification via the CGS Method (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18776172). Four training mechanisms are proposed: confidence-weighted loss; provenance-aware attention; a BlindSpot training objective that maximizes output entropy at known knowledge gaps; and ontology attention — a mechanism enabling the model to switch between axiomatic frameworks, with an entropy-based selection cost that balances explanatory parsimony (commit to one frame) against epistemic humility (maintain multiple frames) depending on context. Ontologies are formally defined as triples (axioms, metric, measure) and parameterized along five dimensions (core axioms, metric structure, evidential standards, scope, temporal orientation), drawing on the SES parameterization from S.V.E. XII (included as supplementary material). VKB-Training was first described as part of the CogOS framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109244). This paper extracts and formalizes the VKB component as a standalone, empirically testable proposal with a falsifiable experimental protocol and pre-specified success thresholds. Section 7 (Ethical Data Sourcing: Author Revenue Sharing, 10–50%) is included in the preprint but will be omitted from the workshop submission. [NOTE: ILLUSTRATIVE NUMBERS — WIP] Prepared for submission to NeurIPS 2025 Workshop.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Laboratoire Spécification et Vérification (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.