Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies To Treat Critically Sized Defects in Compromised Wound Healing Environments

Critically sized bone defects are difficult to treat, necessitating tissue engineering strategies to restore form and function. However, translation of these approaches is often constrained by preclinical models that fail to replicate systemic comorbidities commonly seen in clinical practice, such as diabetes, prior irradiation, osteonecrosis, and osteoporosis, and instead favor healthy wound environments that may overestimate efficacy. This comprehensive review aimed to provide a detailed overview of in vivo bone regeneration strategies for critically sized defects specifically within compromised healing environments, summarizing how animal models are developed and how biomaterial, cellular, and drug delivery platforms are tailored to these disease states. Recent work has sought to address key pathological barriers including chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, poor vascularization, hypocellularity, and the limited efficacy of cell-seeding approaches through a range of bioengineered solutions. Strategies include nanoengineered drug delivery systems, bioactive ion-releasing scaffolds, immunomodulatory and antioxidant biomaterials, advanced cell provisioning, and extracellular vesicle-based therapies designed to restore redox balance, promote angiogenesis, and reestablish osteogenesis. Remaining challenges include heterogeneity and poor standardization of defect models, underrepresentation of multimorbidity and treatment-related injury, ethical and logistical barriers to large animal studies, and uncertainty in how best to bridge emerging platforms with regulatory expectations. Future directions will require coordinated refinement of disease-relevant models and development of multifunctional, context-responsive constructs to more reliably predict and improve clinical translation of bone tissue engineering therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c02130
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies To Treat Critically Sized Defects in Compromised Wound Healing Environments

Nicholas J. Iglesias, Hana Shah, P. G. Coelho, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak et al.
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Bone Tissue Engineering Strategies To Treat Critically Sized Defects in Compromised Wound Healing Environments

Nicholas J. Iglesias, Hana Shah, P. G. Coelho, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Taylor M. Fix, Sara E. Munkwitz, Michelle Camacho, Lukasz Witek, Cesar Pavon
article en

Abstract

Critically sized bone defects are difficult to treat, necessitating tissue engineering strategies to restore form and function. However, translation of these approaches is often constrained by preclinical models that fail to replicate systemic comorbidities commonly seen in clinical practice, such as diabetes, prior irradiation, osteonecrosis, and osteoporosis, and instead favor healthy wound environments that may overestimate efficacy. This comprehensive review aimed to provide a detailed overview of in vivo bone regeneration strategies for critically sized defects specifically within compromised healing environments, summarizing how animal models are developed and how biomaterial, cellular, and drug delivery platforms are tailored to these disease states. Recent work has sought to address key pathological barriers including chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, poor vascularization, hypocellularity, and the limited efficacy of cell-seeding approaches through a range of bioengineered solutions. Strategies include nanoengineered drug delivery systems, bioactive ion-releasing scaffolds, immunomodulatory and antioxidant biomaterials, advanced cell provisioning, and extracellular vesicle-based therapies designed to restore redox balance, promote angiogenesis, and reestablish osteogenesis. Remaining challenges include heterogeneity and poor standardization of defect models, underrepresentation of multimorbidity and treatment-related injury, ethical and logistical barriers to large animal studies, and uncertainty in how best to bridge emerging platforms with regulatory expectations. Future directions will require coordinated refinement of disease-relevant models and development of multifunctional, context-responsive constructs to more reliably predict and improve clinical translation of bone tissue engineering therapies.

ACS Biomaterials Science & EngineeringVol. 12(5)
University of Miami (US), Florida International University (US), Sankt Hans Hospital (DK), Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation (US), Regenerative Medicine Institute (MX), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.