Clinical Handover as Craft, Not Checklist

Handover is one of the most studied elements of clinical care and its importance to the good continuity of care and patient outcomes is well-accepted. Unfortunately, efforts to improve the quality of clinical handovers have led to an environment of compliance exemplified by mnemonics, templates and audits that assume or suggest handovers to be stable, reproducible processes that can be judged by conformity to checklists. However, handovers are highly heterogenous, personalised and nuanced events that do not easily fit into tightly structured models. We draw on observational work in a 2-year, ongoing collaboration between a large emergency department and a human-centred design research team, and argue that handover is essentially a craft: a skilled practice shaped by timing, uncertainty, recipient needs and jurisdictional boundaries. We suggest that standardisation of handovers can work against quality, and that simple checklists threaten to flatten rather than enhance their true craft or value. Shifting how clinical handover is understood, taught, assessed and supported, by emphasising the importance of craft over completeness may be the secret to ensuring quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70247
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Handover as Craft, Not Checklist

Sean Rothwell, Nathan J. Brown, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Daniel Bodnar et al.
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Clinical Handover as Craft, Not Checklist

Sean Rothwell, Nathan J. Brown, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Daniel Bodnar, Ben Matthews, Tobias Grundgeiger
article en

Abstract

Handover is one of the most studied elements of clinical care and its importance to the good continuity of care and patient outcomes is well-accepted. Unfortunately, efforts to improve the quality of clinical handovers have led to an environment of compliance exemplified by mnemonics, templates and audits that assume or suggest handovers to be stable, reproducible processes that can be judged by conformity to checklists. However, handovers are highly heterogenous, personalised and nuanced events that do not easily fit into tightly structured models. We draw on observational work in a 2-year, ongoing collaboration between a large emergency department and a human-centred design research team, and argue that handover is essentially a craft: a skilled practice shaped by timing, uncertainty, recipient needs and jurisdictional boundaries. We suggest that standardisation of handovers can work against quality, and that simple checklists threaten to flatten rather than enhance their true craft or value. Shifting how clinical handover is understood, taught, assessed and supported, by emphasising the importance of craft over completeness may be the secret to ensuring quality.

Emergency Medicine AustralasiaVol. 38(2)
Royal Women's Hospital (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Würzburg (DE), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.