Development and application of a method to simulate commotio cordis inducing impacts for the evaluation of football chest protective equipment

As one of the most widely played and watched contact sports in the United States, football presents a significant risk of blunt chest trauma. Thus, effective chest protection is essential to prevent rare but fatal injuries like commotio cordis. Despite the risk of fatal outcomes, current test methods for certifying chest protective equipment fail to account for injury metrics relevant to commotio cordis and neglect body-to-body collisions, common in contact sports such as football. This study presents the development of a method that simulates shoulder-to-chest impacts via a pneumatic linear impactor, and the evaluation of football chest protectors, with the goal of informing cardiac safety. This statistically verified method considers two impact locations vulnerable to commotio cordis at minimum and moderate football tackle testing speeds to evaluate chest forces, rib deflections, and viscous criterion values of seven different football chest protector combinations on a Hybrid III Upper Torso Assembly. Additionally, this study investigates the quasi-static behavior of the chest to evaluate the predictive capability of quasi-static tests for the dynamic performance of these protector combinations. Researchers show that current football chest protectors fail to reduce viscous criterion values below the established 25% risk threshold for commotio cordis risk at moderate football tackle testing speeds. Additionally, researchers observed a moderate trend between quasi-static stiffness and dynamic viscous criterion ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 0.580, p = 0.0468, slope = 0.059, 95% CI [0.02, 0.963]). Ultimately, a statistically verified test method was developed that differentiates between protector combinations, locations, and speeds, to inform certification standards for football chest protective equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371261438180
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and application of a method to simulate commotio cordis inducing impacts for the evaluation of football chest protective equipment

John D. DesJardins, Anthony P Marino, Grégory Batt, Bianca J Henline et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
article

Development and application of a method to simulate commotio cordis inducing impacts for the evaluation of football chest protective equipment

John D. DesJardins, Anthony P Marino, Grégory Batt, Bianca J Henline, Zachary M. Dolan, Erin C. Meinecke
article en

Abstract

As one of the most widely played and watched contact sports in the United States, football presents a significant risk of blunt chest trauma. Thus, effective chest protection is essential to prevent rare but fatal injuries like commotio cordis. Despite the risk of fatal outcomes, current test methods for certifying chest protective equipment fail to account for injury metrics relevant to commotio cordis and neglect body-to-body collisions, common in contact sports such as football. This study presents the development of a method that simulates shoulder-to-chest impacts via a pneumatic linear impactor, and the evaluation of football chest protectors, with the goal of informing cardiac safety. This statistically verified method considers two impact locations vulnerable to commotio cordis at minimum and moderate football tackle testing speeds to evaluate chest forces, rib deflections, and viscous criterion values of seven different football chest protector combinations on a Hybrid III Upper Torso Assembly. Additionally, this study investigates the quasi-static behavior of the chest to evaluate the predictive capability of quasi-static tests for the dynamic performance of these protector combinations. Researchers show that current football chest protectors fail to reduce viscous criterion values below the established 25% risk threshold for commotio cordis risk at moderate football tackle testing speeds. Additionally, researchers observed a moderate trend between quasi-static stiffness and dynamic viscous criterion ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = 0.580, p = 0.0468, slope = 0.059, 95% CI [0.02, 0.963]). Ultimately, a statistically verified test method was developed that differentiates between protector combinations, locations, and speeds, to inform certification standards for football chest protective equipment.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Clemson University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.