Cost-effectiveness of tooth preservation versus implant for persistent periapical pathosis in mandibular second molars

INTRODUCTION: Persistent apical periodontitis in mandibular second molars presents a clinical decision between tooth preservation and extraction with implant replacement. Although intentional replantation (IR), surgical endodontic treatment, and implant therapy demonstrate acceptable outcomes, their long-term economic value remains unclear. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of tooth-preserving strategies versus extraction with implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model simulated 40-year-old patients with persistent apical periodontitis in a mandibular second molar from a United States (US) private payer perspective. Three strategies were compared: IR, surgical endodontic treatment, and extraction with implant placement. The model used 6-month half cycles over 39.3 years with 3% annual discount rate. Transition probabilities were derived from systematic reviews and clinical studies. Costs were obtained from the American Dental Association (ADA) 2022 survey adjusted to 2025 USD. Effectiveness was expressed as retained tooth-years or implant-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations assessed uncertainty. RESULTS: IR yielded 16.09 retained tooth-years at USD 2,676. Surgical endodontic treatment provided an additional 0.32 years corresponding to 16.41 tooth-years at an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of USD 4,279.66. Extraction with implant placement achieved 19.08 implant-years at an ICER of USD 580.60. Probabilistic analysis showed IR was cost-effective at lower willingness-to-pay thresholds, whereas implant placement became preferred beyond approximately USD 600. CONCLUSION: In mandibular second molars with persistent apical periodontitis, IR proved economically favorable in the short-term, while extraction with implant placement offered superior long-term effectiveness at reasonable incremental costs for patients with extended life expectancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-026-00678-2
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of tooth preservation versus implant for persistent periapical pathosis in mandibular second molars

Nighat Naved, Shaikh Mr, Fahad Umer, Asif Raza Khowaja
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Cost-effectiveness of tooth preservation versus implant for persistent periapical pathosis in mandibular second molars

Nighat Naved, Shaikh Mr, Fahad Umer, Asif Raza Khowaja
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Persistent apical periodontitis in mandibular second molars presents a clinical decision between tooth preservation and extraction with implant replacement. Although intentional replantation (IR), surgical endodontic treatment, and implant therapy demonstrate acceptable outcomes, their long-term economic value remains unclear. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of tooth-preserving strategies versus extraction with implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model simulated 40-year-old patients with persistent apical periodontitis in a mandibular second molar from a United States (US) private payer perspective. Three strategies were compared: IR, surgical endodontic treatment, and extraction with implant placement. The model used 6-month half cycles over 39.3 years with 3% annual discount rate. Transition probabilities were derived from systematic reviews and clinical studies. Costs were obtained from the American Dental Association (ADA) 2022 survey adjusted to 2025 USD. Effectiveness was expressed as retained tooth-years or implant-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations assessed uncertainty. RESULTS: IR yielded 16.09 retained tooth-years at USD 2,676. Surgical endodontic treatment provided an additional 0.32 years corresponding to 16.41 tooth-years at an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of USD 4,279.66. Extraction with implant placement achieved 19.08 implant-years at an ICER of USD 580.60. Probabilistic analysis showed IR was cost-effective at lower willingness-to-pay thresholds, whereas implant placement became preferred beyond approximately USD 600. CONCLUSION: In mandibular second molars with persistent apical periodontitis, IR proved economically favorable in the short-term, while extraction with implant placement offered superior long-term effectiveness at reasonable incremental costs for patients with extended life expectancy.

International Journal of Implant DentistryVol. 12(1)
Brock University (CA), Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.