Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire ( <scp>FPDIP</scp> /R‐ <scp>NPPQ</scp> ): A Validity and Reliability Study

BACKGROUND: Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation (FPDIP/R; FPDR) is increasingly advocated, yet no validated instrument assesses nurses' perceptions and preparedness including organisational readiness for implementation. AIM: To develop and psychometrically validate the FPDIP/R-NPPQ. STUDY DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted in three Italian hospitals (April-July 2024). Registered nurses (N = 212) completed a study-specific instrument initially comprising 52 items; psychometric analyses were performed on 37 Likert-type items. We applied a two-step strategy: exploratory factor analysis (EFA; parallel analysis, principal axis factoring, oblimin rotation, marker-index screening) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using robust maximum likelihood for ordinal/non-normal data. Reliability was estimated via McDonald's ω. A grant from the Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, March 2025, is funding this research. RESULTS: EFA supported a 19-item, three-factor solution explaining 57.47% of variance: (1) emotional value and relational benefits of family presence (5 items); (2) communication skills and structured management (6 items); and (3) operational support through a dedicated staff member (8 items). CFA confirmed good fit (RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI 0.04-0.06; CFit = 0.36; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.92; SRMR = 0.07), with standardised loadings ranging 0.24-0.92 and ω = 0.82-0.87 across factors. Model refinement improved fit without permitting cross-loadings, preserving construct distinctiveness while accounting for localised method effects. CONCLUSIONS: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ is a valid and reliable 19-item, three-factor instrument measuring nurses' readiness for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. By distinguishing attitudes towards family presence, communication/management preparedness and organisational readiness (including the facilitator role), the tool enables services to identify implementation barriers and to plan targeted training and governance strategies prior to adopting FPDR/FPDIP policies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ supports clinical governance by providing actionable subscale profiles to guide implementation of FPDIP/R. It can be used to baseline readiness across units, identify specific training and protocol needs and inform organisational decisions such as the allocation of a trained family facilitator, thereby supporting safer and more standardised family presence practices during critical procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70470
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire ( FPDIP /R‐ NPPQ ): A Validity and Reliability Study

Daniele Napolitano, Francesco Petrosino, Francesca Trotta, Gianluca Pucciarelli et al.
Nursing in Critical Care
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire ( FPDIP /R‐ NPPQ ): A Validity and Reliability Study

Daniele Napolitano, Francesco Petrosino, Francesca Trotta, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Marco Di Muzio, Davide Bartoli, Mariachiara Figura, Marco Fatata
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation (FPDIP/R; FPDR) is increasingly advocated, yet no validated instrument assesses nurses' perceptions and preparedness including organisational readiness for implementation. AIM: To develop and psychometrically validate the FPDIP/R-NPPQ. STUDY DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted in three Italian hospitals (April-July 2024). Registered nurses (N = 212) completed a study-specific instrument initially comprising 52 items; psychometric analyses were performed on 37 Likert-type items. We applied a two-step strategy: exploratory factor analysis (EFA; parallel analysis, principal axis factoring, oblimin rotation, marker-index screening) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using robust maximum likelihood for ordinal/non-normal data. Reliability was estimated via McDonald's ω. A grant from the Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, March 2025, is funding this research. RESULTS: EFA supported a 19-item, three-factor solution explaining 57.47% of variance: (1) emotional value and relational benefits of family presence (5 items); (2) communication skills and structured management (6 items); and (3) operational support through a dedicated staff member (8 items). CFA confirmed good fit (RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI 0.04-0.06; CFit = 0.36; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.92; SRMR = 0.07), with standardised loadings ranging 0.24-0.92 and ω = 0.82-0.87 across factors. Model refinement improved fit without permitting cross-loadings, preserving construct distinctiveness while accounting for localised method effects. CONCLUSIONS: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ is a valid and reliable 19-item, three-factor instrument measuring nurses' readiness for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. By distinguishing attitudes towards family presence, communication/management preparedness and organisational readiness (including the facilitator role), the tool enables services to identify implementation barriers and to plan targeted training and governance strategies prior to adopting FPDR/FPDIP policies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ supports clinical governance by providing actionable subscale profiles to guide implementation of FPDIP/R. It can be used to baseline readiness across units, identify specific training and protocol needs and inform organisational decisions such as the allocation of a trained family facilitator, thereby supporting safer and more standardised family presence practices during critical procedures.

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 31(3)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Salerno (IT), Department of Health (ES), CTO Andrea Alesini (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT), University of Palermo (AR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Central ElectroChemical Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.