Manoobai Chand in Death: Dissection, Labor, and Science in Colonial India

Drawing from a 1913 General Department investigation from Bombay, this article maps the relationship between Annette Benson, the superintendent of Cama Hospital, and Manoobai Chand, a destitute woman whose body Benson had dissected. A study of their intertwined lives raises critical questions about the value assigned to marginalized bodies in life and in their death and the scientific labor that they produce. This article shows how anatomical examination was only possible when state regulations and scientific authority perceived certain bodies as valuable. Such a value was, in turn, only possible if those bodies were marked unproductive in life. Anatomical practice then depended on whose body could perform scientific labor and whose body could become of value. Methodologically, this article opens conversations on labor history and the history of science by interrogating the nature of labor and perceived value in producing scientific knowledge and extending the question of labor to the afterlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isis
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740959
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manoobai Chand in Death: Dissection, Labor, and Science in Colonial India

Sohini Chattopadhyay
Isis
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Manoobai Chand in Death: Dissection, Labor, and Science in Colonial India

Sohini Chattopadhyay
article en

Abstract

Drawing from a 1913 General Department investigation from Bombay, this article maps the relationship between Annette Benson, the superintendent of Cama Hospital, and Manoobai Chand, a destitute woman whose body Benson had dissected. A study of their intertwined lives raises critical questions about the value assigned to marginalized bodies in life and in their death and the scientific labor that they produce. This article shows how anatomical examination was only possible when state regulations and scientific authority perceived certain bodies as valuable. Such a value was, in turn, only possible if those bodies were marked unproductive in life. Anatomical practice then depended on whose body could perform scientific labor and whose body could become of value. Methodologically, this article opens conversations on labor history and the history of science by interrogating the nature of labor and perceived value in producing scientific knowledge and extending the question of labor to the afterlife.

Isis
Union College (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.