Integration of population-based surveys for neglected tropical diseases: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) can be controlled by interventions in populations with disease or biomarker prevalence above certain thresholds, but surveys to identify these target populations drive up the resources required. Existing survey guidelines focus on single diseases, missing opportunities to collect and analyse data on multiple co-occurring diseases more efficiently. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and synthesise strategies for integrating NTD surveys, evaluate costs and cost savings, and summarise key challenges and recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant studies until September 2024. Study characteristics such as survey design, sampling methods, and survey integration approaches, challenges and recommendations were extracted and organised thematically. RESULTS: A total of 2,829 relevant documents were retrieved, and 81 articles met the inclusion criteria. The use of multiplex assays, allowing simultaneous testing for multiple antibodies from a single sample, and collecting multiple sample types (blood, urine, and stool) in one visit, can save time and reduce costs. Leveraging existing platforms, such as lymphatic filariasis Transmission Assessment Surveys, malaria surveys, and the standardised trachoma prevalence surveys, also enables substantial cost savings by optimising shared resources. Integrated surveys demonstrated notable cost-efficiency and operational feasibility. However, integration can be challenging due to methodological differences, lack of coordination, community resistance, and funding challenges. Key recommendations include strong stakeholder engagement, robust planning, leveraging of existing infrastructure, community involvement, methodological flexibility, and adoption of technologies such as rapid diagnostic tests and mobile tools to optimise data collection. CONCLUSION: Integrated NTD surveys, when strategically designed and contextually adapted, enhance efficiency and reduce costs. Future initiatives should focus on optimising survey integration, leveraging existing health infrastructure, and fostering cross-program collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013733
Primary Topic
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of population-based surveys for neglected tropical diseases: A scoping review

Amanuel Belay, Agumasie Semahegn, Hope Simpson, Gail Davey et al.
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
article

Integration of population-based surveys for neglected tropical diseases: A scoping review

Amanuel Belay, Agumasie Semahegn, Hope Simpson, Gail Davey, Abebaw Fekadu, Binyam Tesfaw Hailu, Rana Ahmed
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) can be controlled by interventions in populations with disease or biomarker prevalence above certain thresholds, but surveys to identify these target populations drive up the resources required. Existing survey guidelines focus on single diseases, missing opportunities to collect and analyse data on multiple co-occurring diseases more efficiently. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify and synthesise strategies for integrating NTD surveys, evaluate costs and cost savings, and summarise key challenges and recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant studies until September 2024. Study characteristics such as survey design, sampling methods, and survey integration approaches, challenges and recommendations were extracted and organised thematically. RESULTS: A total of 2,829 relevant documents were retrieved, and 81 articles met the inclusion criteria. The use of multiplex assays, allowing simultaneous testing for multiple antibodies from a single sample, and collecting multiple sample types (blood, urine, and stool) in one visit, can save time and reduce costs. Leveraging existing platforms, such as lymphatic filariasis Transmission Assessment Surveys, malaria surveys, and the standardised trachoma prevalence surveys, also enables substantial cost savings by optimising shared resources. Integrated surveys demonstrated notable cost-efficiency and operational feasibility. However, integration can be challenging due to methodological differences, lack of coordination, community resistance, and funding challenges. Key recommendations include strong stakeholder engagement, robust planning, leveraging of existing infrastructure, community involvement, methodological flexibility, and adoption of technologies such as rapid diagnostic tests and mobile tools to optimise data collection. CONCLUSION: Integrated NTD surveys, when strategically designed and contextually adapted, enhance efficiency and reduce costs. Future initiatives should focus on optimising survey integration, leveraging existing health infrastructure, and fostering cross-program collaboration.

PLoS neglected tropical diseasesVol. 20(4)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University College Dublin (IE), Haramaya University (ET), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Addis Ababa University (ET)
National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.