Platelet-rich plasma for immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic cutaneous scars enter an immature phase after re-epithelialization, characterized by ongoing inflammation and active remodeling. This phase, typically within six months of injury, may allow preventive interventions before pathological scarring develops. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested as a modulator of scar remodeling due to its growth factor content, but its role in immature scars has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To map and summarize the clinical evidence on autologous platelet-containing plasma (ACP), including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), for immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids, and to identify gaps for future research. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following established frameworks and reporting guidelines. Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, DOAJ, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies evaluating ACP or PRP applied to post-traumatic scars within six months post-epithelialization were included. RESULTS: Five studies involving 65 patients met inclusion criteria, including randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports. PRP was mainly delivered via intralesional injection. Evidence suggests PRP may improve clinical scar scores and patient-reported outcomes, with no serious adverse events reported. However, studies were heterogeneous in PRP preparation, dosing, timing, and outcome measures. No study was designed to assess PRP as a preventive monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for PRP in immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids is extremely limited and heterogeneous. While preliminary findings indicate potential benefit and safety, current data are insufficient to support routine preventive use. High-quality, prospective studies are needed to determine whether PRP can influence scar remodeling or prevent pathological scarring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345754
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platelet-rich plasma for immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids: A scoping review

Alessandro Alvarado, Taylys A Leyton, Miguel Borge, Sofia Gonzalez et al.
PLoS ONE
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Platelet-rich plasma for immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids: A scoping review

Alessandro Alvarado, Taylys A Leyton, Miguel Borge, Sofia Gonzalez, Erick Correa, Virgilio Blandón
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic cutaneous scars enter an immature phase after re-epithelialization, characterized by ongoing inflammation and active remodeling. This phase, typically within six months of injury, may allow preventive interventions before pathological scarring develops. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested as a modulator of scar remodeling due to its growth factor content, but its role in immature scars has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To map and summarize the clinical evidence on autologous platelet-containing plasma (ACP), including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), for immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids, and to identify gaps for future research. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following established frameworks and reporting guidelines. Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, DOAJ, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies evaluating ACP or PRP applied to post-traumatic scars within six months post-epithelialization were included. RESULTS: Five studies involving 65 patients met inclusion criteria, including randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports. PRP was mainly delivered via intralesional injection. Evidence suggests PRP may improve clinical scar scores and patient-reported outcomes, with no serious adverse events reported. However, studies were heterogeneous in PRP preparation, dosing, timing, and outcome measures. No study was designed to assess PRP as a preventive monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for PRP in immature post-traumatic scars and early keloids is extremely limited and heterogeneous. While preliminary findings indicate potential benefit and safety, current data are insufficient to support routine preventive use. High-quality, prospective studies are needed to determine whether PRP can influence scar remodeling or prevent pathological scarring.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Universidad de Ciencias Medicas (CR), La Universidad Americana (NI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.