‘Most Favored Nation’ Policies And Value-Based Drug Pricing: A European View

More than two decades of US purchasers essentially allowing pharmaceutical manufacturers to charge whatever they want have resulted in US companies' global leadership in biomedical sciences. President Donald Trump's proposed "most favored nation" drug pricing policies are causing a shift, whereby drugs' value stops being a national conversation and becomes a mechanical convergence of prices under US pressure and under coming threat of new, fierce competition. Presumably, the proposed policies could lead to higher drug prices in the European Union (EU), but they will hardly generate more income for US pharmaceutical companies, which might even stay away from European markets to avoid having to disclose their EU net prices, unless they develop global breakthrough competitive strategies. The proposals certainly will change EU manufacturers' investment strategies and are already accelerating the polarization of their national price negotiation goals and methods. Within this new geopolitical context, European nations' policies should be driven by a much more holistic and strategic approach to what "value" means.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2026.00115
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Most Favored Nation’ Policies And Value-Based Drug Pricing: A European View

F. Megerlin
Health Affairs
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

‘Most Favored Nation’ Policies And Value-Based Drug Pricing: A European View

F. Megerlin
article en

Abstract

More than two decades of US purchasers essentially allowing pharmaceutical manufacturers to charge whatever they want have resulted in US companies' global leadership in biomedical sciences. President Donald Trump's proposed "most favored nation" drug pricing policies are causing a shift, whereby drugs' value stops being a national conversation and becomes a mechanical convergence of prices under US pressure and under coming threat of new, fierce competition. Presumably, the proposed policies could lead to higher drug prices in the European Union (EU), but they will hardly generate more income for US pharmaceutical companies, which might even stay away from European markets to avoid having to disclose their EU net prices, unless they develop global breakthrough competitive strategies. The proposals certainly will change EU manufacturers' investment strategies and are already accelerating the polarization of their national price negotiation goals and methods. Within this new geopolitical context, European nations' policies should be driven by a much more holistic and strategic approach to what "value" means.

Health AffairsVol. 45(4)
Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.