Dual Blessing or Dual Constraint? Chinese Universities' Spatial Imaginary and Navigation in Pursuit of Global Reputation

ABSTRACT This article explores how Chinese universities navigate global and national spaces in their pursuit of global reputation, revealing inherent paradoxes within both. Drawing on the glonacal agency heuristic, the study highlights universities' agentic imaginaries in guiding their practices and navigating material spaces. The findings show that the fluid global space facilitates academic mobility and collaboration while exposing macro‐structural challenges such as ideological misalignments, systemic inequalities and geopolitical tensions. Within the national space, the Chinese government provides policy guidance and financial support yet restricts international engagement and enforces a rigid evaluation system. By negotiating between these spaces, Chinese universities demonstrate critical self‐reflection and cultivate an agentic imaginary characterised by reciprocity, fluidity and openness. They actively seek to challenge global inequalities and initiate new relational activities. The study offers actionable insights for non‐Western universities seeking to enhance global reputation and deepens theoretical understanding of how institutions exercise agency across global‐national contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70128
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual Blessing or Dual Constraint? Chinese Universities' Spatial Imaginary and Navigation in Pursuit of Global Reputation

Lili Yang, Jie Ding
Higher Education Quarterly
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Dual Blessing or Dual Constraint? Chinese Universities' Spatial Imaginary and Navigation in Pursuit of Global Reputation

Lili Yang, Jie Ding
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores how Chinese universities navigate global and national spaces in their pursuit of global reputation, revealing inherent paradoxes within both. Drawing on the glonacal agency heuristic, the study highlights universities' agentic imaginaries in guiding their practices and navigating material spaces. The findings show that the fluid global space facilitates academic mobility and collaboration while exposing macro‐structural challenges such as ideological misalignments, systemic inequalities and geopolitical tensions. Within the national space, the Chinese government provides policy guidance and financial support yet restricts international engagement and enforces a rigid evaluation system. By negotiating between these spaces, Chinese universities demonstrate critical self‐reflection and cultivate an agentic imaginary characterised by reciprocity, fluidity and openness. They actively seek to challenge global inequalities and initiate new relational activities. The study offers actionable insights for non‐Western universities seeking to enhance global reputation and deepens theoretical understanding of how institutions exercise agency across global‐national contexts.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 80(2)
Education University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.