Is there a “weekend effect” in adenoma detection rate?A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The "weekend effect"-inferior patient outcomes on weekends-has been reported across healthcare. Its impact on colonoscopy quality, particularly the adenoma detection rate (ADR), a key predictor of colorectal cancer risk, has not been fully established. This study investigated whether a weekend effect exists for ADR in a large cohort and analyzed potential contributing factors. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into Weekend (Saturday/Sunday) and Weekday (Monday-Friday) groups. The primary outcome was ADR (proportion with ≥1 adenoma). Data on demographics, withdrawal time, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and endoscopist experience (Junior <5 years, Senior ≥5 years) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with adenoma detection. Stratified analyses by patient subgroups, withdrawal time, and individual endoscopists were performed. RESULTS: Of 16,550 colonoscopies (4,435 Weekend, 12,115 Weekday), ADR was significantly lower on weekends (24.1% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.006). Median withdrawal time was shorter on weekends (3.61 vs. 4.59 minutes, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, weekend procedures were independently associated with lower ADR (aOR 0.892, 95% CI: 0.821-0.970, p = 0.007), indicating decreased odds of adenoma detection. Other independent predictors included female sex (aOR 0.613, p < 0.001), increasing patient age (aOR 1.050/year, p < 0.001), adequate bowel preparation (BBPS ≥6; aOR 1.407, p < 0.001), and procedure by a senior endoscopist (aOR 1.164, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the weekend effect was significant in specific patient groups compared to their weekday counterparts: females (aOR 0.868, p = 0.022), patients aged 50-59 years (aOR 0.698, p < 0.001), and those with inadequate preparation (BBPS<6; aOR 0.640, p = 0.010). The lower weekend ADR was primarily attributed to two junior endoscopists, with no significant effect observed among senior endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: A significant weekend effect on ADR was confirmed, principally mediated by shorter withdrawal times and concentrated among junior endoscopists. The effect disproportionately affected women, middle-aged patients, and those with poor bowel preparation. Quality improvement efforts should therefore prioritize enforcing guideline-adherent withdrawal times, optimizing bowel preparation, and providing targeted support to less-experienced endoscopists during weekend services to standardize colonoscopy quality across all days of the week.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345613
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there a “weekend effect” in adenoma detection rate?A single-center retrospective study

Bijuan Lin, Zhizhong Lu, Conghua Song, Baorang Cai et al.
PLoS ONE
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Is there a “weekend effect” in adenoma detection rate?A single-center retrospective study

Bijuan Lin, Zhizhong Lu, Conghua Song, Baorang Cai, Chenxing Jian, Xinxiang Huang, Dongdong Lv, Huifeng Wu, Dongsheng Chen, Lijuan Zheng, Chao Zhong Huang, Yuxiang Wang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The "weekend effect"-inferior patient outcomes on weekends-has been reported across healthcare. Its impact on colonoscopy quality, particularly the adenoma detection rate (ADR), a key predictor of colorectal cancer risk, has not been fully established. This study investigated whether a weekend effect exists for ADR in a large cohort and analyzed potential contributing factors. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into Weekend (Saturday/Sunday) and Weekday (Monday-Friday) groups. The primary outcome was ADR (proportion with ≥1 adenoma). Data on demographics, withdrawal time, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and endoscopist experience (Junior <5 years, Senior ≥5 years) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with adenoma detection. Stratified analyses by patient subgroups, withdrawal time, and individual endoscopists were performed. RESULTS: Of 16,550 colonoscopies (4,435 Weekend, 12,115 Weekday), ADR was significantly lower on weekends (24.1% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.006). Median withdrawal time was shorter on weekends (3.61 vs. 4.59 minutes, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, weekend procedures were independently associated with lower ADR (aOR 0.892, 95% CI: 0.821-0.970, p = 0.007), indicating decreased odds of adenoma detection. Other independent predictors included female sex (aOR 0.613, p < 0.001), increasing patient age (aOR 1.050/year, p < 0.001), adequate bowel preparation (BBPS ≥6; aOR 1.407, p < 0.001), and procedure by a senior endoscopist (aOR 1.164, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the weekend effect was significant in specific patient groups compared to their weekday counterparts: females (aOR 0.868, p = 0.022), patients aged 50-59 years (aOR 0.698, p < 0.001), and those with inadequate preparation (BBPS<6; aOR 0.640, p = 0.010). The lower weekend ADR was primarily attributed to two junior endoscopists, with no significant effect observed among senior endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: A significant weekend effect on ADR was confirmed, principally mediated by shorter withdrawal times and concentrated among junior endoscopists. The effect disproportionately affected women, middle-aged patients, and those with poor bowel preparation. Quality improvement efforts should therefore prioritize enforcing guideline-adherent withdrawal times, optimizing bowel preparation, and providing targeted support to less-experienced endoscopists during weekend services to standardize colonoscopy quality across all days of the week.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Putian University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.