Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are the standard of care in type 1 diabetes. Recent studies suggest benefits of these systems for people with type 2 diabetes, as well. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of AID systems on glycemic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched through 10 March 2025. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251036184). STUDY SELECTION: Nine studies (n = 1,530 participants) were included that evaluated AID systems in people with type 2 diabetes reporting continuous glucose monitoring outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were collected on study characteristics and outcomes including time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]), time above range (TAR) (>10.0 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]), time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL]), mean glucose, and HbA1c. We performed a single-arm meta-analysis using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: AID systems significantly increased TIR by 16.06% (95% CI 10.48-21.65), was changed TAR by -15.90% (95% CI -21.44 to -10.36), was changed HbA1c by -1.27% (95% CI -2.06 to -0.48), and changed mean glucose by -21.34 mg/dL (95% CI -32.06 to -10.62) or 1.19 mmol/L (95% CI -1.78 to -0.59). There was a modest yet significant reduction in TBR. There were no changes in body weight or BMI. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneous study designs, including only three randomized controlled trials, and imputed missing data. CONCLUSIONS: AID systems improved glucose control in a diverse population of individuals with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin therapy with reduction in hypoglycemia. These findings support recommendations for AID systems use in future type 2 diabetes management guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Care
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-2435
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Gabriel Cavalcante Lima Chagas, Marconi Abreu, Larissa Calixto Hespanhol, Giulia Carvalhal et al.
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Gabriel Cavalcante Lima Chagas, Marconi Abreu, Larissa Calixto Hespanhol, Giulia Carvalhal, Oscar Inácio de Mendonça Bisneto, Rodolfo J. Galindo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are the standard of care in type 1 diabetes. Recent studies suggest benefits of these systems for people with type 2 diabetes, as well. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of AID systems on glycemic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched through 10 March 2025. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251036184). STUDY SELECTION: Nine studies (n = 1,530 participants) were included that evaluated AID systems in people with type 2 diabetes reporting continuous glucose monitoring outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were collected on study characteristics and outcomes including time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]), time above range (TAR) (>10.0 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]), time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL]), mean glucose, and HbA1c. We performed a single-arm meta-analysis using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: AID systems significantly increased TIR by 16.06% (95% CI 10.48-21.65), was changed TAR by -15.90% (95% CI -21.44 to -10.36), was changed HbA1c by -1.27% (95% CI -2.06 to -0.48), and changed mean glucose by -21.34 mg/dL (95% CI -32.06 to -10.62) or 1.19 mmol/L (95% CI -1.78 to -0.59). There was a modest yet significant reduction in TBR. There were no changes in body weight or BMI. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneous study designs, including only three randomized controlled trials, and imputed missing data. CONCLUSIONS: AID systems improved glucose control in a diverse population of individuals with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin therapy with reduction in hypoglycemia. These findings support recommendations for AID systems use in future type 2 diabetes management guidelines.

Diabetes Care
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Miami (US), Cleveland Foundation (US), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.