The feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth (‘Rapid Stratified Telehealth’) for patients with low back pain: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Establish the feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth ('Rapid Stratified Telehealth') to reduce waiting times for people with low back pain seeking care at Australian public hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a single-blinded, single site, 2:1 ratio, two-arm parallel feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with nested qualitative interviews. Usual clinic-based care for low back pain was compared to Rapid Stratified Telehealth which matched the mode and type of care to participant's risk of persistent disabling pain based on the Keele STarT MSK Tool and potential radiculopathy. Key process outcomes include acceptability of the model, intervention fidelity and adherence, appointment details, response, recruitment and consent rates, and missing data. Additional outcomes included waiting time to access care, clinical outcomes, healthcare utilisation, and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes were summarised descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 133 people screened, 101 were eligible (76%), and 40 (30%) were randomised (intervention 26, usual care 14). Feasibility targets were met for acceptability, fidelity, and missing data but not met for recruitment, consent, and response rates. Adherence data was uncertain due to poor reporting. Intervention participants waited a median of 13 days less for their first appointment vs. usual care participants (16 days vs. 29 days). Small sample size and differences in baseline characteristics mean additional outcomes should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: This study provides important information to guide modifications to our Rapid Stratified Telehealth model of care and planning of a large multisite RCT across hospital outpatient clinics. Key Points • Our new model of care is feasible to deliver and evaluate in a fully powered RCT. • No intervention participant was at low risk of persistent disabling pain. • More than half of the intervention participants received clinic-based care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rheumatology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-026-07955-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth (‘Rapid Stratified Telehealth’) for patients with low back pain: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial

Christopher Needs, Danielle Coombs, Tarcisio F de Campos, Gustavo Machado et al.
1 citations
Clinical Rheumatology
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
26.17
article

The feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth (‘Rapid Stratified Telehealth’) for patients with low back pain: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial

Christopher Needs, Danielle Coombs, Tarcisio F de Campos, Gustavo Machado, Joshua R Zadro, Christopher Han, Marnee J. McKay, Andrew R Gamble, David Martens, Joshua M. Hutton, Christopher G. Maher, Nadine E. Foster, David B. Anderson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Establish the feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth ('Rapid Stratified Telehealth') to reduce waiting times for people with low back pain seeking care at Australian public hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a single-blinded, single site, 2:1 ratio, two-arm parallel feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with nested qualitative interviews. Usual clinic-based care for low back pain was compared to Rapid Stratified Telehealth which matched the mode and type of care to participant's risk of persistent disabling pain based on the Keele STarT MSK Tool and potential radiculopathy. Key process outcomes include acceptability of the model, intervention fidelity and adherence, appointment details, response, recruitment and consent rates, and missing data. Additional outcomes included waiting time to access care, clinical outcomes, healthcare utilisation, and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes were summarised descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 133 people screened, 101 were eligible (76%), and 40 (30%) were randomised (intervention 26, usual care 14). Feasibility targets were met for acceptability, fidelity, and missing data but not met for recruitment, consent, and response rates. Adherence data was uncertain due to poor reporting. Intervention participants waited a median of 13 days less for their first appointment vs. usual care participants (16 days vs. 29 days). Small sample size and differences in baseline characteristics mean additional outcomes should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: This study provides important information to guide modifications to our Rapid Stratified Telehealth model of care and planning of a large multisite RCT across hospital outpatient clinics. Key Points • Our new model of care is feasible to deliver and evaluate in a fully powered RCT. • No intervention participant was at low risk of persistent disabling pain. • More than half of the intervention participants received clinic-based care.

Clinical Rheumatology
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Institute for Musculoskeletal Health (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Arthritis Australia, University of Sydney, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, National Health and Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
26.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.