A cross-sectional multilevel study of bullying victimisation among adolescents: the role of body weight status and social capital across 38 countries

Given the disadvantages of bullying victimisation on adolescent health, this study evaluates how adolescent body weight status, as the main individual-level factor, and social capital, as an essential country-level factor, affect bullying victimisation among adolescents globally. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study 2017/2018 included 143,091 participants across 38 countries. It captures the main individual factor and the individual control factor. Adolescents were categorised as “Else (Thinness or Normal)” or “Overweight and Obese (OAO)” based on IOTF age- and gender-specific cut-off criteria. The 2015 Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (GSCI) captured social capital at country-level, while the 2016 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the 2016 Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) served as country-level control variables. This study utilised a cross-sectional multilevel approach to address the study aims. OAO adolescents were significantly linked to an increased risk of bullying victimisation (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.13, 1.21], p < 0.01), consistent across male (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.12, 1.22], p < 0.01) and female adolescents (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.10, 1.23], p < 0.01). At the country level, higher social capital correlated with a reduced likelihood of being bullied (OR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.99], p < 0.05). An important interaction between social capital and body weight status was noted (OR = 1.01, 95% CI [1.001, 1.01], p < 0.05). A statistically significant but substantively minimal cross-level interaction between body weight status and country social capital was identified, indicating low variation in the relationship across country contexts. Research demonstrates that bullying victimisation arises from individual vulnerabilities and overarching systemic factors. While social capital at the country-level typically provides protection, its efficacy in alleviating weight-related bullying differences is limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27176-9
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional multilevel study of bullying victimisation among adolescents: the role of body weight status and social capital across 38 countries

Wen‐Hsu Lin, Ajeng Nova Dumpratiwi
BMC Public Health
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

A cross-sectional multilevel study of bullying victimisation among adolescents: the role of body weight status and social capital across 38 countries

Wen‐Hsu Lin, Ajeng Nova Dumpratiwi
article en

Abstract

Given the disadvantages of bullying victimisation on adolescent health, this study evaluates how adolescent body weight status, as the main individual-level factor, and social capital, as an essential country-level factor, affect bullying victimisation among adolescents globally. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study 2017/2018 included 143,091 participants across 38 countries. It captures the main individual factor and the individual control factor. Adolescents were categorised as “Else (Thinness or Normal)” or “Overweight and Obese (OAO)” based on IOTF age- and gender-specific cut-off criteria. The 2015 Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (GSCI) captured social capital at country-level, while the 2016 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the 2016 Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) served as country-level control variables. This study utilised a cross-sectional multilevel approach to address the study aims. OAO adolescents were significantly linked to an increased risk of bullying victimisation (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.13, 1.21], p < 0.01), consistent across male (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.12, 1.22], p < 0.01) and female adolescents (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.10, 1.23], p < 0.01). At the country level, higher social capital correlated with a reduced likelihood of being bullied (OR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.99], p < 0.05). An important interaction between social capital and body weight status was noted (OR = 1.01, 95% CI [1.001, 1.01], p < 0.05). A statistically significant but substantively minimal cross-level interaction between body weight status and country social capital was identified, indicating low variation in the relationship across country contexts. Research demonstrates that bullying victimisation arises from individual vulnerabilities and overarching systemic factors. While social capital at the country-level typically provides protection, its efficacy in alleviating weight-related bullying differences is limited.

BMC Public Health
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.