Methods for assessing coactivation in the lower limb muscles during overground walking poststroke: a systematic review

Recovering an independent and efficient gait is essential for social participation and quality of life after a stroke. However, muscle coactivation (MCo) is considered a major limiting factor. This study aimed to systematically review the methods used to assess lower limb MCo during overground walking in stroke survivors. Major scientific databases were searched, and 19 articles were ultimately included. Data extraction focused on gait cycle detection, surface electromyograph (sEMG) acquisition settings, signal processing, and MCo calculation, specifically the coactivation index (CoI) and coactivation duration (CoD). Results revealed variability in methodological choices across all stages required to assess MCo. Regarding acquisition and processing approaches, several commonalities were identified, such as the use of Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles guidelines for electrode placement and the application of a single threshold for muscle activation detection. Conversely, significant variability was found in the selection of gait cycle phases and signal filtering techniques. Furthermore, this heterogeneity was particularly pronounced in the final MCo calculation stage. Specifically, CoI represents the most diverse approach, with seven distinct formulas, which prevents the proposal of a common method. Conversely, CoD measurement shared a unique calculation formula associated with more common methodological elements, allowing for the proposal of a standardized approach. This common method was also aligned with current sEMG recommendations. Overall, although standardized methods have been established to assess the MCo, neither CoI nor CoD has yet undergone sufficient reliability testing to support routine clinical use. This review underscores the need for methodological rigour to improve the comparability of MCo assessments in stroke rehabilitation research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000704
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for assessing coactivation in the lower limb muscles during overground walking poststroke: a systematic review

Maxence Compagnat, Antoine Frasie, Camille Cormier, Clément Doumenc et al.
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Methods for assessing coactivation in the lower limb muscles during overground walking poststroke: a systematic review

Maxence Compagnat, Antoine Frasie, Camille Cormier, Clément Doumenc, Stéphane MANDIGOUT, Jean-Christophe Daviet
article en

Abstract

Recovering an independent and efficient gait is essential for social participation and quality of life after a stroke. However, muscle coactivation (MCo) is considered a major limiting factor. This study aimed to systematically review the methods used to assess lower limb MCo during overground walking in stroke survivors. Major scientific databases were searched, and 19 articles were ultimately included. Data extraction focused on gait cycle detection, surface electromyograph (sEMG) acquisition settings, signal processing, and MCo calculation, specifically the coactivation index (CoI) and coactivation duration (CoD). Results revealed variability in methodological choices across all stages required to assess MCo. Regarding acquisition and processing approaches, several commonalities were identified, such as the use of Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles guidelines for electrode placement and the application of a single threshold for muscle activation detection. Conversely, significant variability was found in the selection of gait cycle phases and signal filtering techniques. Furthermore, this heterogeneity was particularly pronounced in the final MCo calculation stage. Specifically, CoI represents the most diverse approach, with seven distinct formulas, which prevents the proposal of a common method. Conversely, CoD measurement shared a unique calculation formula associated with more common methodological elements, allowing for the proposal of a standardized approach. This common method was also aligned with current sEMG recommendations. Overall, although standardized methods have been established to assess the MCo, neither CoI nor CoD has yet undergone sufficient reliability testing to support routine clinical use. This review underscores the need for methodological rigour to improve the comparability of MCo assessments in stroke rehabilitation research.

International Journal of Rehabilitation ResearchVol. 49(2)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CA), Université de Limoges (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.