Industry Payments and Prescribing of Brand-Name Multiple Sclerosis Medications in Medicare
OBJECTIVES: Industry payments to clinicians influence prescribing, limiting use of lower-cost generics, and leading to nonadherence. This study of prescribing for multiple sclerosis examined whether payments from brand-name drug manufacturers were associated with prescribing of brand-name glatiramer and dimethyl fumarate after generics became available. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used 2021-2022 Open Payments data and 2022-2023 Medicare Part D prescription data. Payments from Teva (glatiramer) and Biogen (dimethyl fumarate) were categorized as none, <$1,000, or ≥$1,000. The outcome was the proportion of brand-name prescriptions per clinician, categorized as low (<20%), medium (20%-79%), or high (≥80%). Associations were assessed using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for prescriber type, prescription volume, and geographic region. RESULTS: < 0.001). Payments <$1,000 were also associated with higher brand-name prescribing. DISCUSSION: Payments to clinicians were associated with lower uptake of generic versions of 2 MS drugs, resulting in higher spending by patients and the US health care system.
Authors
- A. M. Patel
- Benjamin N. Rome (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3293)
- Aaron S. Kesselheim
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurology
- Published
- 2026-04-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214834
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 63.46