Women on corporate boards in developed markets

Despite decades of policy discourse, voluntary diversity initiatives, and growing scholarly attention, women remain severely underrepresented on the corporate boards of developed market companies, especially as a director of the corporate board or similar. Most existing research on board gender diversity draws on large-cap indices, generating a systematically optimistic picture of women's progress in accessing corporate governance roles. This study addresses that gap by providing a large-scale, cross-sectional empirical analysis of board gender diversity across four global regions (Americas, Europe, Asia, and Oceania), 35 countries, and all 11 GICS sectors, drawing on a dataset of 19,591 board director records from developed market companies compiled from LSEG Data and Analytics. The findings reveal the severity and universality of women's marginalization: female directors hold just 7.23% of board seats globally, exposing the structural distance from gender parity even in developed markets. This figure falls far below the levels typically reported. Regional differences are statistically significant but modest in effect size, reflecting the near-universal nature of gender underrepresentation rather than its concentration in specific geographies. At the sectoral level, male board dominance is not industry-neutral: women are most visible in Utilities (13.20%) and most marginalized in Energy (4.92%), patterns that invite further feminist inquiry into how sector-specific cultures and labor histories shape women's access to economic authority. Also, a significant board-executive gap is documented: female executives account for only 5.48% of officer positions indicating that gender barriers compound across hierarchical levels. These findings enrich the women's studies literature by providing a rigorous, cross-regional, multi-sector empirical foundation for feminist scholarship, policy advocacy, and corporate governance reform in order to understand how gender inequality is reproduced at the highest levels of economic power. They provide empirical grounds for prioritizing binding regulatory mandates over voluntary frameworks, for integrating board-level diversity initiatives with executive pipeline development, and for recalibrating the benchmarks against which progress is measured. Without structural intervention, gender parity on corporate boards across the developed market universe remains a distant prospect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Studies International Forum
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103335
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women on corporate boards in developed markets

Claudia Ogrean, Mihaela Herciu, Carolina Ţîmbalari, Alexandra Radu et al.
Women s Studies International Forum
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Women on corporate boards in developed markets

Claudia Ogrean, Mihaela Herciu, Carolina Ţîmbalari, Alexandra Radu, Simona Vinerean, Radu Șerban
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of policy discourse, voluntary diversity initiatives, and growing scholarly attention, women remain severely underrepresented on the corporate boards of developed market companies, especially as a director of the corporate board or similar. Most existing research on board gender diversity draws on large-cap indices, generating a systematically optimistic picture of women's progress in accessing corporate governance roles. This study addresses that gap by providing a large-scale, cross-sectional empirical analysis of board gender diversity across four global regions (Americas, Europe, Asia, and Oceania), 35 countries, and all 11 GICS sectors, drawing on a dataset of 19,591 board director records from developed market companies compiled from LSEG Data and Analytics. The findings reveal the severity and universality of women's marginalization: female directors hold just 7.23% of board seats globally, exposing the structural distance from gender parity even in developed markets. This figure falls far below the levels typically reported. Regional differences are statistically significant but modest in effect size, reflecting the near-universal nature of gender underrepresentation rather than its concentration in specific geographies. At the sectoral level, male board dominance is not industry-neutral: women are most visible in Utilities (13.20%) and most marginalized in Energy (4.92%), patterns that invite further feminist inquiry into how sector-specific cultures and labor histories shape women's access to economic authority. Also, a significant board-executive gap is documented: female executives account for only 5.48% of officer positions indicating that gender barriers compound across hierarchical levels. These findings enrich the women's studies literature by providing a rigorous, cross-regional, multi-sector empirical foundation for feminist scholarship, policy advocacy, and corporate governance reform in order to understand how gender inequality is reproduced at the highest levels of economic power. They provide empirical grounds for prioritizing binding regulatory mandates over voluntary frameworks, for integrating board-level diversity initiatives with executive pipeline development, and for recalibrating the benchmarks against which progress is measured. Without structural intervention, gender parity on corporate boards across the developed market universe remains a distant prospect.

Women s Studies International ForumVol. 117
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Universitatea "Lucian Blaga" din Sibiu
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.