Interventions to Reduce Child Poverty and Its Determinants: A Rapid Overview of Reviews

ABSTRACT Despite evidence for various child poverty reduction strategies, there is ambiguity regarding the most effective types to inform policy. Thus, we conducted an overview of reviews to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize interventions for reducing childhood poverty in high‐income country settings. We searched five electronic databases from January 2013 to December 2023 for systematic reviews of effects of interventions aimed at reducing childhood poverty or its core determinants in English or French. We assessed the quality of the reviews using AMSTAR 2.0. We included 25 reviews: 15 systematic reviews, three systematic reviews with meta‐analyses, four scoping reviews, two overviews, and one rapid review. The quality of the systematic reviews was low. We found evidence of benefit for interventions addressing children and family support, promoting healthy living, safe and affordable housing, community sustainability programs, and integrated services. Limitations of the primary studies include a high risk of bias and the use of non‐standard outcomes. Despite the positive effects of these interventions, the quality of the reviews for child poverty reduction programs is low. Future research should prioritize developing high‐quality studies that assess long‐term intervention effects. Policymakers should approach intervention implementation cautiously while integrating program evaluations to ensure desirable outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poverty & Public Policy
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.70058
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions to Reduce Child Poverty and Its Determinants: A Rapid Overview of Reviews

Haben Dawit, Omar Dewidar, Anita Rizvi, Ashlee Chan et al.
Poverty & Public Policy
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Interventions to Reduce Child Poverty and Its Determinants: A Rapid Overview of Reviews

Haben Dawit, Omar Dewidar, Anita Rizvi, Ashlee Chan, Therese Lane, Hind Sabri, Rasoul Turko, Sarah Funnell, Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Ghogomu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite evidence for various child poverty reduction strategies, there is ambiguity regarding the most effective types to inform policy. Thus, we conducted an overview of reviews to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize interventions for reducing childhood poverty in high‐income country settings. We searched five electronic databases from January 2013 to December 2023 for systematic reviews of effects of interventions aimed at reducing childhood poverty or its core determinants in English or French. We assessed the quality of the reviews using AMSTAR 2.0. We included 25 reviews: 15 systematic reviews, three systematic reviews with meta‐analyses, four scoping reviews, two overviews, and one rapid review. The quality of the systematic reviews was low. We found evidence of benefit for interventions addressing children and family support, promoting healthy living, safe and affordable housing, community sustainability programs, and integrated services. Limitations of the primary studies include a high risk of bias and the use of non‐standard outcomes. Despite the positive effects of these interventions, the quality of the reviews for child poverty reduction programs is low. Future research should prioritize developing high‐quality studies that assess long‐term intervention effects. Policymakers should approach intervention implementation cautiously while integrating program evaluations to ensure desirable outcomes.

Poverty & Public PolicyVol. 18(2)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Toronto Dementia Research Alliance (CA), Bruyère (CA), Carleton University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.